2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3624888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-consistency in frozen-density embedding theory based calculations

Abstract: The bi-functional for the non-electrostatic part of the exact embedding potential of frozen-density embedding theory (FDET) depends on whether the embedded part is described by means of a real interacting many-electron system or the reference system of non-interacting electrons (see [Wesolowski, Phys. Rev. A. 77, 11444 (2008)]). The difference δΔF(MD)[ρ(A)]/δρ(A)(r), where ΔF(MD)[ρ(A)] is the functional bound from below by the correlation functional E(c)[ρ(A)] and from above by zero. Taking in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other cases, omitting this term completely (in the energy functional and in the embedding potential) does not invalidate the key feature of FDET: the energy evaluated with this potential will still be the upper bound of the groundstate energy of the total system. Numerical examples show 29 even if the simplest form (single determinant) of the embedded wavefunction. Until now, we kept the F MD [ρ A ] term in all equations for the sake of completeness and generality-to include methods which do not take into account the correlation effects within the embedded subsystem completely.…”
Section: Fdet and Beyond-fdet Approximate Methods For Excited Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other cases, omitting this term completely (in the energy functional and in the embedding potential) does not invalidate the key feature of FDET: the energy evaluated with this potential will still be the upper bound of the groundstate energy of the total system. Numerical examples show 29 even if the simplest form (single determinant) of the embedded wavefunction. Until now, we kept the F MD [ρ A ] term in all equations for the sake of completeness and generality-to include methods which do not take into account the correlation effects within the embedded subsystem completely.…”
Section: Fdet and Beyond-fdet Approximate Methods For Excited Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include Amsterdam Density-Functional (ADF) [101], TURBOMOLE [99,102], deMon [36,103], Dirac [104], Q-Chem [45], and MolCas [105]. The number of features and the flexibility of the implementations may vary, but all of them share some important similarities, such as the use of localized atom-centered basis sets (Slater or Gaussian type).…”
Section: Applications Of Subsystem Dft 221 Molecular Systems: Localmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full embedding kernel contribution can be expressed as (63) with the delta function indicating that the Coulomb term is only evaluated for the inter-subsystem interaction (i = j). For convenience, we introduce auxiliary kernel contributions to specify the kinetic energy and exchange-correlation terms in the embedding kernel,…”
Section: B Dft-in-dft Response Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%