“…We obtain, as L → ϱ, R M → 0.054 for the magnetization and R → 0.016 for the susceptibility, both in agreement with previous results. 42 The ratio here obtained, R M / R Ӎ 3.4, disagrees with RG predictions: Aharony and Harris 43 obtained, using ⑀ =4−d expansions, that the leading term is R M / R =1/4. The discrepancy may come from higher-order terms in the expansion, and not from the definition of the susceptibility as was suggested by Berche et al 32 Note also that, in the present work, the definition for the susceptibility, = JL 3 ͓͗M 2 ͘ − ͗M͘ 2 ͔, differs from that used by Wiseman and Domany, 42 = JL 3 ͓͗M 2 ͔͘.…”