1998
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.58.2938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-averaging, distribution of pseudocritical temperatures, and finite size scaling in critical disordered systems

Abstract: We evaluate by Monte Carlo simulations various singular thermodynamic quantities X, for an ensemble of quenched random Ising and Ashkin-Teller models. The measurements are taken at T c and we study how the distributions P (X) (and, in particular, their relative squared width, R X ) over the ensemble depend on the system size l. The Ashkin-Teller model was studied in the regime where bond randomness is irrelevant and we found weak self averaging; R X ∼ l α ν → 0, where α < 0 and ν are the exponents (of the pure… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
93
3
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(200 reference statements)
14
93
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We obtain, as L → ϱ, R M → 0.054 for the magnetization and R → 0.016 for the susceptibility, both in agreement with previous results. 42 The ratio here obtained, R M / R Ӎ 3.4, disagrees with RG predictions: Aharony and Harris 43 obtained, using ⑀ =4−d expansions, that the leading term is R M / R =1/4. The discrepancy may come from higher-order terms in the expansion, and not from the definition of the susceptibility as was suggested by Berche et al 32 Note also that, in the present work, the definition for the susceptibility, = JL 3 ͓͗M 2 ͘ − ͗M͘ 2 ͔, differs from that used by Wiseman and Domany, 42 = JL 3 ͓͗M 2 ͔͘.…”
Section: Disorder Sampling and Self-averagingcontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…We obtain, as L → ϱ, R M → 0.054 for the magnetization and R → 0.016 for the susceptibility, both in agreement with previous results. 42 The ratio here obtained, R M / R Ӎ 3.4, disagrees with RG predictions: Aharony and Harris 43 obtained, using ⑀ =4−d expansions, that the leading term is R M / R =1/4. The discrepancy may come from higher-order terms in the expansion, and not from the definition of the susceptibility as was suggested by Berche et al 32 Note also that, in the present work, the definition for the susceptibility, = JL 3 ͓͗M 2 ͘ − ͗M͘ 2 ͔, differs from that used by Wiseman and Domany, 42 = JL 3 ͓͗M 2 ͔͘.…”
Section: Disorder Sampling and Self-averagingcontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…If however, the system is governed by a random fixed point, then lim L→∞ R X = const. This criterion explains the numerical results of many works [5,6,7]. Wiseman and Domany in [7] show that the Ashkin-Teller model with α < 0 is weakly self-averaging.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In the last twenty years, important progress [58,59,60] has been made in the understanding of finite size properties of random critical points. For our purpose we only recall that to each realization of disorder (ω), one can associate a pseudo-critical temperature T d (ω, N ), defined for instance as the temperature where the relevant susceptibility is maximum.…”
Section: Harris Criterion and Random Critical Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%