1994
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/27/6/001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-attracting walk with nu <1/2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
48
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The present model exhibits distinctive features, such as a new scaling function defined through Eq. (18), and anticorrelated Lévy steps with exponent −3 at the subdiffusive transition. The visitation and first-passage statistics are also likely to be peculiar in this model, and their study certainly deserves future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present model exhibits distinctive features, such as a new scaling function defined through Eq. (18), and anticorrelated Lévy steps with exponent −3 at the subdiffusive transition. The visitation and first-passage statistics are also likely to be peculiar in this model, and their study certainly deserves future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random walk models in similar vein to ours had been studied in relation to self-interacting random walks [8][9][10][11][12]. For example, Duxbury and de Queiroz [10] assigned to each (simple) random walk trajectory the "energy" in the form of exp (−g i n i α ), where n i is the visitation numbers of the site i as in our model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Self-attracting random walks are path-dependent processes where a walker tends to return to previously visited sites [36,37]. Numerical simulations and scaling arguments clearly show that selfattracting walks can exhibit subdiffusion [38][39][40]. These mathematically challenging processes cannot be readily analyzed with better known frameworks for subdiffusive phenomena, such as fractional Fokker-Planck equations [8] or scaled Brownian motions [41,42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%