2005
DOI: 10.1002/ange.200462841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self‐Assembly of an Amphiphilic Iron(III) Chelator: Mimicking Iron Acquisition in Marine Bacteria

Abstract: Iron is one of the most common elements on Earth, but its availability to living organisms is limited because of its extremely low solubility. Siderophores are low-molecularweight iron(iii) chelators that were evolved by microorganisms for the uptake of physiologically essential iron.[1] Among the mechanisms proposed for iron solubilization and transport into cells, [2] the self-assembly of amphiphilic siderophores from marine bacteria observed by Butler et al.[3] is a noteworthy process. Hydrophilic sideropho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the results of Hider, which are beyond doubt, the biological results obtained with the hydroxyquinoline chelators do not depend on partition coefficient: O-TRENSOX and its iron complex are water soluble and insoluble in lipophilic medium, but exhibit the same biological activity as the amphiphilic COX 750 (Figure 9a). Another recent approach involves chelators possessing an anionic hydrophilic head (the ferric chelate) and a neutral lipophilic tail capable of self-organization, leading to vesicles that mimic the behaviour of marine siderophores (Apostol et al 2005). In this case, the tripodal triscatecholate ligand was obtained by reaction of the 2, 2, 2-tris[3-(2, 3-dimethoxy-benzamido)propyl]-acetic acid precursor (Imbert et al 2000) with the acyl chloride derivative and hexadecylamine, and then deprotection of the catechol groups ( Figure 9b).…”
Section: Lipophilic and Amphiphilic Siderophoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to the results of Hider, which are beyond doubt, the biological results obtained with the hydroxyquinoline chelators do not depend on partition coefficient: O-TRENSOX and its iron complex are water soluble and insoluble in lipophilic medium, but exhibit the same biological activity as the amphiphilic COX 750 (Figure 9a). Another recent approach involves chelators possessing an anionic hydrophilic head (the ferric chelate) and a neutral lipophilic tail capable of self-organization, leading to vesicles that mimic the behaviour of marine siderophores (Apostol et al 2005). In this case, the tripodal triscatecholate ligand was obtained by reaction of the 2, 2, 2-tris[3-(2, 3-dimethoxy-benzamido)propyl]-acetic acid precursor (Imbert et al 2000) with the acyl chloride derivative and hexadecylamine, and then deprotection of the catechol groups ( Figure 9b).…”
Section: Lipophilic and Amphiphilic Siderophoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Some metal chelating surfactants undergo a change in aggregate morphology upon metal coordination. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] For example, micelles of 4,8-dioctyl-3,9-dioxo-6-hydroxy-4,8-diaza-1,11-undecanedicarboxylate undergo a phase transition to vesicles upon coordination of Cu(II) to the dicarboxylate head group. 16 The phospholipid cardiolipin assembles as a lamellar phase in the absence of metals and forms a reverse-hexagonal phase in the presence of certain divalent metal cations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keywords: iron · marine siderophore mimics · micelles · self-assembly · vesicles monodentate and tris(bidentate) synthetic catecholate Fe III chelators. [6] We have also shown that the denticity of the ligand did not significantly influence the aggregation processes. These chelators and their Fe III complexes have tensioactive properties, with a critical micelle concentration (CMC) of < 10 À5 m at pH 7.4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…[7] Herein we present the self-assembling properties of the iron complex of sulfonated monocatechol derivative L S10 as opposed to unsulfonated ligand L a previously studied. [6] Results and discussion Synthesis: Amphiphilic ligand L S10 was prepared by using a straightforward synthesis (Scheme 1). This method affords some advantages over the synthetic pathway previously described [6] because it avoids protection of the catechol moiety and the use of hydrolysable acyl chloride during the amidification step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation