2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.12.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-assembled polymer phenylethnylcopper nanowires for photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic performance under visible light

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
22
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Refined Cu‐Cu distances are 2.45–2.65 Å (Table S1), while the Cu‐C distances are 1.64–2.60 Å. The distance between Cu atoms is smaller than the van der Waals radius of copper, which indicates the existence of weak interaction between joint Cu atoms and the formation of coordination bonds between Cu and phenylacetylene [16] . It can be observed that the XRD pattern of P 1 bulges in the 2 θ range of 15–30°, which indicates the existence of amorphous components in P 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refined Cu‐Cu distances are 2.45–2.65 Å (Table S1), while the Cu‐C distances are 1.64–2.60 Å. The distance between Cu atoms is smaller than the van der Waals radius of copper, which indicates the existence of weak interaction between joint Cu atoms and the formation of coordination bonds between Cu and phenylacetylene [16] . It can be observed that the XRD pattern of P 1 bulges in the 2 θ range of 15–30°, which indicates the existence of amorphous components in P 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As displayed in Figure 8a, the negative photocurrents of PhC 2 Cu and PhC 2 Cu 2.5 indicate they are both p type semiconductors. [ 20 ] Four times higher photocurrent of PhC 2 Cu than that of PhC 2 Cu 2.5 again support more conduction band electrons were generated by PhC 2 Cu under visible light irradiation, which is also indicated by stronger absorption of PhC 2 Cu than PhC 2 Cu 2.5 at the wavelength of 400–500 nm in Figure 4a. This is considered to be the main reason for the preferred O 2 reduction and 2,4‐DCP degradation by PhC 2 Cu.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…[4][5][6][7][8] From the view of micro point, efficient adsorption of the pollutant molecules on the surface of semiconductors is a key step during their degradation processes. Considering the preferential adsorption of organic pollutants on organic surfaces, specialized organic and inorganicorganic semiconductors, such as g-C 3 N 4, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), [15][16][17][18] and some metal-organic coordination polymers [19][20][21][22] were developed for the degradation of these organic pollutants with high toxicity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Refined Cu-Cu distances are 2.45-2.65 (Table S1), while the Cu-C distances are 1.64-2.60 .T he distance between Cu atoms is smaller than the van der Waals radius of copper, which indicates the existence of weak interaction between joint Cu atoms and the formation of coordination bonds between Cu and phenylacetylene. [16] It can be observed that the XRD pattern of P1 bulges in the 2q range of 15-308 8, which indicates the existence of amorphous components in P1.Indexing the XRD peak positions of P1 gave triclinic cell parameters,and P1 exhibited alarger unit cell volume than P2 (Table 1). Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were conducted to optimize the crystal structures of P1 and P2 and the corresponding CIF files have been provided in Supporting Information (SI, Data S1 and S2) and TheC ambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC,2 061812 and 2061813).…”
Section: Angewandte Chemiementioning
confidence: 95%