2022
DOI: 10.1097/med.0000000000000735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-antigens, benign autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes: a beta-cell and T-cell perspective

Abstract: Purpose of reviewRecent work using immunopeptidomics and deconvolution of the antigenic reactivity of islet-infiltrating CD8þ T cells has expanded our knowledge about the autoimmune target epitopes of type 1 diabetes. The stem-like properties of autoimmune CD8þ T cells have also been described. We here propose a possible link between these findings. Recent findingsWeak major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-binding epitopes list among the major targets of human islet-infiltrating CD8þ T cells, likely resulting… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, our work focused on predicted HLA-I ligands, and the datasets used to train prediction algorithms are mostly derived from viral and tumor immunology studies. While in these studies HLA-I binding is a good predictor of T-cell immunogenicity, it likely underestimates the number of potential epitopes in the case of autoimmunity 43 , possibly reflecting a bias imposed by thymic T-cell deletion. Predicted non-binders may hide additional immunogenic peptides, as recently demonstrated for cancer neo-epitopes 66,67 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, our work focused on predicted HLA-I ligands, and the datasets used to train prediction algorithms are mostly derived from viral and tumor immunology studies. While in these studies HLA-I binding is a good predictor of T-cell immunogenicity, it likely underestimates the number of potential epitopes in the case of autoimmunity 43 , possibly reflecting a bias imposed by thymic T-cell deletion. Predicted non-binders may hide additional immunogenic peptides, as recently demonstrated for cancer neo-epitopes 66,67 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The INS DRiP case is noteworthy, as it has been confirmed as a relevant T-cell antigen targeted by islet-infiltrating CD8 + T-cells 32 . The short-lived and unstable nature of INS DRiP and the fact that its presentation is enhanced by IFN-γ but not IFN-α 42 may explain this discrepancy, emphasizing the need for complementary antigen identification strategies 43 . The proteasome-independent generation of some peptides identified may reflect their processing in other cell compartments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, CD8+ T-cells are induced to kill target cells by mechanisms involving recognition of relevant (“non-self”) peptides which are processed and displayed on MHC class I molecules. 67 , 68 Importantly, a hallmark feature of type 1 diabetes is the hyper-expression of MHC-I on islet cells which are induced to reach levels well beyond those found in the islets of control subjects without diabetes. 69 Elution of the peptides that are displayed on islet cell MHC-I under these conditions suggest that these could be involved in immune cell targeting, especially as they are likely to become displayed at increased intensity as a result of the MHC-I hyper-expression.…”
Section: Factors Driving Insulitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies using MHC multimers also reported that autoantigen-specific T cells are found in the circulation of healthy individuals, typically with similar frequencies, 40 , 60 , 62 , 63 which suggests that negative selection in the thymus may be limited to the highest affinity autoreactive T cells in all individuals, and that in T1D patients, it is mainly a defective regulation of the remaining T cells that allows them to be activated and become pathogenic. 64 Beyond detecting those T cells, it may be more important to determine their phenotype (i.e., whether these circulating T cells are more activated and antigen-experienced). Again, in MHC multimer-based analyses of circulating autoreactive CD8+ T cells comparing control and T1D donors, differences are difficult to pinpoint.…”
Section: What Immune Biomarkers and Epitope Characteristics May Be Us...mentioning
confidence: 99%