Self and shared leadership in decision quality: a tale of two sides

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to investigate the relationship between shared leadership (SL) and decision quality, utilizing shared leadership theory (SLT) and behavioral decision theory (BDT). The authors will explore the mediating role of “decision comprehensiveness” in the SL–decision quality linkage. Additionally, the authors will examine how individual “self-leadership” and “debate” among team members moderate the relationship between SL and decision comprehensiveness.Design/methodology/approachThe authors tested the hypothesized moderated mediation model using a sample of 506 professionals employed in 112 research and development (R&D) teams, along with their direct managers from large Italian firms. To examine the relationships, the authors employed confirmatory factor analyses and path analyses. In order to address endogeneity concerns, the authors incorporated an instrumental variable, namely delegation, into the analysis.FindingsSL positively influences decision quality, mediated by decision comprehensiveness, where teams include comprehensive information in decision-making. The level of debate among team members positively moderates the SL–decision comprehensiveness relationship. High levels of self-leadership can harm SL by reducing decision comprehensiveness, indicating a downside. However, low or moderate levels of self-leadership do not harm decision comprehensiveness and can even benefit SL.Originality/valueThis is the first work to investigate the relationship between SL and decision quality, shedding light on the mechanisms underlying this association. By integrating SLT and BDT, the authors provide insights into how managers can make higher-quality decisions within self-leading teams. Moreover, this research makes a distinct contribution to the field of self-leadership by delineating its boundaries and identifying a potentially negative aspect within the self-influence process.

CEO anger: a catalyst for error recognition and learning

“…The pivotal role of EM culture in shaping the interplay between anger and error value recognition underscores the significance of fostering a supportive learning culture (Cusin and Goujon-Belghit, 2019; Cristofaro et al. , 2023).…”

“…The pivotal role of EM culture in shaping the interplay between anger and error value recognition underscores the significance of fostering a supportive learning culture (Cusin and Goujon-Belghit, 2019;Cristofaro et al, 2023). The moderating influences of supply chain disruptions, experience, and positive grieving accentuate the necessity for considering these factors in devising EM strategies and nurturing a learning culture.…”