2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2014.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-adjoint extensions of the Laplace–Beltrami operator and unitaries at the boundary

Abstract: We construct in this article a class of closed semi-bounded quadratic forms on the space of square integrable functions over a smooth Riemannian manifold with smooth compact boundary. Each of these quadratic forms specifies a semibounded self-adjoint extension of the Laplace-Beltrami operator. These quadratic forms are based on the Lagrange boundary form on the manifold and a family of domains parametrized by a suitable class of unitary operators on the boundary that will be called admissible. The correspondin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before making explicit the previous structures in concrete examples we notice that the previous discussion works in a similar way with the covariant Laplacian ∆ A discussed in Section 3. Thus if we are given a group acting by unitary bundle isomorphisms on an Hermitean bundle E → Ω (and by isometric diffeomorphisms on the Riemannian manifold Ω), then any unitary operator U at the boundary, (that in addition satisfies the conditions of possessing gap and being admissible, [Ib14c], that guarantee that the quadratic form constructed from the operator ∇ with boundary conditions dictated by U , read more about self-adjoint extensions determined by quadratic forms in [Ib14] and [Ib15] this volume), and that verifies the commutation relations of Theorem 19 describes a G-invariant quadratic form. The closure of this quadratic form characterizes uniquely a G-invariant self-adjoint extension of the Laplace-Beltrami operator.…”
Section: Examples: Groups Acting By Isometriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Before making explicit the previous structures in concrete examples we notice that the previous discussion works in a similar way with the covariant Laplacian ∆ A discussed in Section 3. Thus if we are given a group acting by unitary bundle isomorphisms on an Hermitean bundle E → Ω (and by isometric diffeomorphisms on the Riemannian manifold Ω), then any unitary operator U at the boundary, (that in addition satisfies the conditions of possessing gap and being admissible, [Ib14c], that guarantee that the quadratic form constructed from the operator ∇ with boundary conditions dictated by U , read more about self-adjoint extensions determined by quadratic forms in [Ib14] and [Ib15] this volume), and that verifies the commutation relations of Theorem 19 describes a G-invariant quadratic form. The closure of this quadratic form characterizes uniquely a G-invariant self-adjoint extension of the Laplace-Beltrami operator.…”
Section: Examples: Groups Acting By Isometriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will just quote the analysis of non-local extensions of elliptic operators by Grubb [Gr68] and the theory of singular perturbations of differential operators by Albeverio and Kurasov [Al99] because of their influence on this work (see also [Ib14] for a quadratic forms based analysis of the extensions of the Laplace-Beltrami operator and [Ib12] where the reader will find a reasonable list of references on the subject).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, von Neumann's theorem is not suitable to perform explicit calculations. We are going to use the approach introduced in [AIM05] and further developed in [ILPP13].…”
Section: Hence We Need To Find Solutions Of the Following Equation Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Koc75, AIM05,ILPP13], that maximally isotropic subspaces of a bilinear form like the one at the right hand side are determined uniquely by unitaries U :…”
Section: Now If We Denote the Lie Derivative Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation