2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selenium-enriched durum wheat improves the nutritional profile of pasta without altering its organoleptic properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
39
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(2019) reported that foliar spray application of 21 g Se ha −1 as selenate at grain filling significantly improved shoot biomass and grain yield in wheat. However, De Vita et al. (2017) found no effect of foliar application of selenate at the rates of up to 120 g Se ha −1 on wheat grain yield at the booting stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…(2019) reported that foliar spray application of 21 g Se ha −1 as selenate at grain filling significantly improved shoot biomass and grain yield in wheat. However, De Vita et al. (2017) found no effect of foliar application of selenate at the rates of up to 120 g Se ha −1 on wheat grain yield at the booting stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This suggests that breeders could use molecular markers in breeding and selection for modified Se levels without affecting the grain. For instance, existing evidence shows that increasing Se concentrations in durum wheat grains via foliage dressing does not alter the nutritional profile of pasta during processing and cooking (De Vita et al 2017). Notably, Qse.sau-3D was detected in multiple tissues over two consecutive plant growth cycles in this study, and the associated QTL were continuously expressed during the growth period at Se-deficiency conditions.…”
Section: Molecular Marker Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…In previous studies, de Vita et al. () observed no symptoms of toxicity in a wheat field foliar‐sprayed with 400 mg L −1 (120 g ha −1 ) Se(VI), while foliar spraying with 285 g ha −1 Se(IV) even improved the quality of maize grains ( Wang et al., ). Furthermore, no visible symptoms of phytotoxicity were observed in rice plots following foliar spraying with 467 mg L −1 (210 g ha −1 ) Se(IV) ( Ning et al., ), or in apple trees after one‐time foliar spraying with 200 mg L −1 Se(IV) across different growth stages ( Ning et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several studies have shown that foliar spraying of Se in rice, wheat, corn, and grapes is markedly superior to soil application (Boldrin et al, 2013;Chu et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013b;Zheng et al, 2016). Moreover, spraying date also affects Se uptake and distribution in plants, with a delay in application considered beneficial in increasing Se accumulation in rice and wheat grains as well as in apple fruit (Ning et al, 2013;Deng et al, 2017;de Vita et al, 2017). Interestingly, an opposite trend was observed in blueberries .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%