2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.12.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selenium concentration and speciation in biofortified flour and bread: Retention of selenium during grain biofortification, processing and production of Se-enriched food

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

11
82
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
11
82
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 3, SeMet was the major Se species found in all samples, which is in agreement with Cubadda et al (2010) and Hart et al (2011), who have stated that about 75 and 60 %, respectively, of the total Se present in wheat flour is in the form of SeMet. Even if the matrix material of our samples cannot be strictly viewed as typical (commercial) wheat flour, 70 to 100 % of their total Se is in the form of SeMet.…”
Section: Selenium Speciationsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Table 3, SeMet was the major Se species found in all samples, which is in agreement with Cubadda et al (2010) and Hart et al (2011), who have stated that about 75 and 60 %, respectively, of the total Se present in wheat flour is in the form of SeMet. Even if the matrix material of our samples cannot be strictly viewed as typical (commercial) wheat flour, 70 to 100 % of their total Se is in the form of SeMet.…”
Section: Selenium Speciationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This is important for conveying Se through the food chain, since SeMet can be unspecifically incorporated into proteins instead of methionine, that, in turn, is known for an elevated incorporation into proteins and enzymes (Pedrero et al 2007). Hart et al (2011) have also reported that SeMet might account for 65-87 % of total extractable species in Seenriched flour, after supplementing Triticum aestivum L. (bread wheat) with 100 g of Se per ha (as sodium selenate), just prior to booting stage. Even if the growth stage is not exactly the same, the corresponding values herein for booting Fig.…”
Section: Selenium Speciationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when data were referred to mg ha -1 (multiplying the total Se in μg kg -1 of Se by the grain yield) to take into account that possible dilution effect, the amount of Se in the flour was also much higher in -2011than in 2011-2012. Therefore, in this case, rather than a dilution effect, it could be hypothesized that the lower the water availability, the lower the uptake, and consequently the smaller the Se accumulation in the grain.…”
Section: Total Se In the Grain And In The Flourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparative result indicated that JS could develop in 10% of salt while F could tolerate 18% of salt (data not shown). This consequence agrees with the source of the two strains and F is suitable for use in pickles.A series of concentration gradients (0; 0.50; 3.0; 5.0; 8.0; 12; 15; 20; 25; 30; 40; 50 µg sodium selenite/mL nutrient solution) were chosen following the research data of Hart et al (2011), Liguang et al (2011) and Penglase et al (2011, so that a primary range of sodium selenite additive amount could be determined. For this purpose, the selected strains were inoculated in the solid media (PDA…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of concentration gradients (0; 0.50; 3.0; 5.0; 8.0; 12; 15; 20; 25; 30; 40; 50 µg sodium selenite/mL nutrient solution) were chosen following the research data of Hart et al (2011), Liguang et al (2011 and Penglase et al (2011), so that a primary range of sodium selenite additive amount could be determined. For this purpose, the selected strains were inoculated in the solid media (PDA Acceleration effect of sodium selenite on yeast growth and fermentative capability (Received September 3, 2014;Accepted November 12, 2014) (Zeng, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%