2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selenium and other trace metals in fish inhabiting a fly ash stream: Implications for regulatory tissue thresholds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean selenium concentration of bluegill in the Savannah River, South Carolina and Georgia is 1.55 µg/g (Burger et al, 2001). Somewhat of a paradox is provided by the observations made by Reash et al (2006) in southeast Ohio; Reash et al (2006) reported a mean whole-body selenium concentration of 17.26 µg/g and range 6.15 − 51.64 µg/g in bluegill with no observed adverse effects on survival, teratogenesis, and reproductive failure. The results of this study contradicts previous reports showing population-level effects at much lower selenium concentrations than those found in southeast Ohio.…”
Section: Comparison With Field Datamentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The mean selenium concentration of bluegill in the Savannah River, South Carolina and Georgia is 1.55 µg/g (Burger et al, 2001). Somewhat of a paradox is provided by the observations made by Reash et al (2006) in southeast Ohio; Reash et al (2006) reported a mean whole-body selenium concentration of 17.26 µg/g and range 6.15 − 51.64 µg/g in bluegill with no observed adverse effects on survival, teratogenesis, and reproductive failure. The results of this study contradicts previous reports showing population-level effects at much lower selenium concentrations than those found in southeast Ohio.…”
Section: Comparison With Field Datamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An association between other trace metals have been observed to reduce the toxicity of selenium and other elements, and may provide a possible explanation for no evident population-level effects. But there is a lack of data to quantify a strong relationship (Reash et al, 2006). Concentrations as high as 50 µg/g (Reash et al, 2006) would certainly result in considerable population-level effects experiencing environmental stochasticity.…”
Section: Comparison With Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sample and Suter II (2002) also highlighted the ecological risks posed to terrestrial wildlife associated with coal ash disposal sites. Of the different contaminants found in fly ash, trace elements are considered serious environmental contaminants due to: (1) their mobilization and bioaccumulation in food chain via plants, (2) contamination of waters due to leaching, and (3) their toxicity to biota (Carlson and Adriano 1993;Adriano et al 2002;Brake et al 2004;Reash et al 2006). The issue that fly ash is nonhazardous, but some of the trace elements present in it are toxic is yet to be reconciled (Rubin 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%