Selectivity of N170 for visual words in the right hemisphere: Evidence from single‐trial analysis

Abstract

Neuroimaging and neuropsychological studies have identified the involvement of the right posterior region in the processing of visual words. Interestingly, in contrast, ERP studies of the N170 typically demonstrate selectivity for words more strikingly over the left hemisphere. Why is right hemisphere selectivity for words during the N170 epoch typically not observed, despite the clear involvement of this region in word processing? One possibility is that amplitude differences measured on averaged ERPs in previous studies may have been obscured by variation in peak latency across trials. This study examined this possibility by using single-trial analysis. Results show that words evoked greater single-trial N170s than control stimuli in the right hemisphere. Additionally, we observed larger trial-to-trial variability on N170 peak latency for words as compared to control stimuli over the right hemisphere. Results demonstrate that, in contrast to much of the prior literature, the N170 can be selective to words over the right hemisphere. This discrepancy is explained in terms of variability in trial-to-trial peak latency for responses to words over the right hemisphere.

ReSync: Correcting the trial-to-trial asynchrony of event-related brain potentials to improve neural response representation

“…timing, behavioral effect, functional role, and anatomical feature (Bodmer, Muckschel, Roessner, & Beste, 2018;Miller, Ulrich, & Schwarz, 2009;Yang et al, 2017;D. D. Zhang, Ding, Wang, Qi, & Luo, 2015).…”

ERP Perspective Analysis of PSS Component and Decision-Making

“…Scholars have demonstrated that not only faces but also Chinese characters may generate an N170 component. One previous study indicated that N170 is not constant for facial representation, suggesting that the cognitive tasks may significantly affect the N170 amplitude [38]. The N170 amplitude may be a common reaction to highly familiar visual stimuli [38].…”

“…One previous study indicated that N170 is not constant for facial representation, suggesting that the cognitive tasks may significantly affect the N170 amplitude [38]. The N170 amplitude may be a common reaction to highly familiar visual stimuli [38]. For instance, scholars compare the N170 component elicited by human faces with the ERPs elicited by ape faces, birds, cars, and items of furniture, in order to explore face specificity in visual processing.…”

“…The N170 components can be induced not only by face stimuli but also by stimuli such as cars, houses, shoes, furniture, tools, road signs, flowers, and printed words [37]. The larger N170 elicited by faces may be influenced by their expertise in recognizing faces [38]. The customer's preferences and requirements may be presented by the similarity in the cognition information of the individual, which may generate the ERP component, such as N170.…”

The influence of perceptual load on the orthographic complexity of Arabic words processing: ERP Evidence

“…In the study of (Yang et al, 2017), the authors examined the possibility whether the right hemisphere is responding selectivity for words during the N170 epoch. The authors used single-trial analysis.…”