2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2011.01916.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selectivity of commercial compared to larger mesh and square mesh trawl codends for four fish species in the Aegean Sea

Abstract: Differences in size selectivity of commercial (40 mm diamond mesh, 40D), larger mesh (48 mm diamond mesh, 48D), and square mesh codends (40 mm square mesh, 40S) for hake (Merluccius merluccius), greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides), blackbelly rosefish (Helicolenus dactylopterus dactylopterus) and four-spot megrim (Lepidorhombus boscii) were investigated in the Aegean Sea. The study was conducted using the covered codend method. Data were analysed taking betweenhaul variations into account. Results showed tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the body form of flatfishes caught in this study, it is understood that square-mesh codends are not proper for flatfish species to escape. Similar findings for square-mesh codends had been reported in the studies that were carried out in the Mediterranean Sea about bottom trawl net selectivity (Özbilgin et al 2012(Özbilgin et al , Eryaşar 2017. Özbilgin et al (2012) reported that square-mesh codend is not a definitive solution to the poor bottom trawl net selection, especially for many flat and high-bodied fish species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Considering the body form of flatfishes caught in this study, it is understood that square-mesh codends are not proper for flatfish species to escape. Similar findings for square-mesh codends had been reported in the studies that were carried out in the Mediterranean Sea about bottom trawl net selectivity (Özbilgin et al 2012(Özbilgin et al , Eryaşar 2017. Özbilgin et al (2012) reported that square-mesh codend is not a definitive solution to the poor bottom trawl net selection, especially for many flat and high-bodied fish species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Previous studies from the Mediterranean have shown that increasing mesh size in the trawl codends improves the L50 values (Özbilgin et al, 2012;Tokaç et al, 2014). In this study, It was determined that increasing mesh size (from 44 to 50 mm) would lead to in the range of 7 to 17% increase in L50 values for three species except Atlantic horse mackerel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…On the other hand, Ragonese and Bianchini (2006) suggested that the range of 50.2-70.3 mm is a "biologically-sound mesh size" referring to the size at 50% maturity ranges of 20-22 mm for rose shrimp for Italian waters. Guijarro and Massutí (2006) (Aydın et al 2010); and 16.9 cm (42.9 mm) (Ozbilgin et al 2012). On the other hand, a T90 L 50 value determined in the course of the presently reported study (12.2 cm) is comparable to the previously reported value of 12.5 cm (Tokac et al 2010, Ozbilgin et al 2012, determined for diamond-mesh codend of 42.4 and 42.2 mm, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%