2014
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selectivity in early prosocial behavior

Abstract: Prosocial behavior requires expenditure of personal resources for the benefit of others, a fact that creates a “problem” when considering the evolution of prosociality. Models that address this problem have been developed, with emphasis typically placed on reciprocity. One model considers the advantages of being selective in terms of one’s allocation of prosocial behavior so as to improve the chance that one will be benefitted in return. In this review paper, we first summarize this “partner choice” model and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
54
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…That is to say, although the manipulation in the reward condition changed the child's expectation of a future reward, it might have also changed their perception of the puppet's social intent. There is evidence that children's prosocial behavior is selective (e.g., Dunfield & Kuhlmeier, ; Kuhlmeier, Dunfield, & O'Neill, ). For instance, 3‐year‐old children avoid helping people with harmful intentions (Vaish, Carpenter, & Tomasello, ) but share more with a partner who has shared with them before (Warneken & Tomasello, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is to say, although the manipulation in the reward condition changed the child's expectation of a future reward, it might have also changed their perception of the puppet's social intent. There is evidence that children's prosocial behavior is selective (e.g., Dunfield & Kuhlmeier, ; Kuhlmeier, Dunfield, & O'Neill, ). For instance, 3‐year‐old children avoid helping people with harmful intentions (Vaish, Carpenter, & Tomasello, ) but share more with a partner who has shared with them before (Warneken & Tomasello, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, by age 3 or 4, children also develop another related motivation, to punish or withdraw cooperation from bad social partners (V. A. Kuhlmeier, Dunfield, & O'Neill, 2014;Warneken & Tomasello, 2013). This view is supported by evidence that 2.5-year-olds repeatedly help or share with their partner regardless of whether their partner returns the favor, but 3-year-olds share less over time if their partner never reciprocates (Warneken & Tomasello, 2013).…”
Section: Features Of the Recipientmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The foundations of contingent social behavior can be demonstrated even in infancy (Hamlin, 2013;Tomasello & Vaish, 2013). Even in the first 12 months of life children distinguish events that would be ascribed different valences by adults from their cultural group, such as events involving hitting and caressing (Premack & Premack, 1997), helping and hindering (Hamlin, Wynn & Bloom, 2007;Kuhlmeier, Dunfield & O'Neill, 2014;Kuhlmeier, Wynn & Bloom, 2003), and equal and unequal distributions of resources (Geraci & Surian, 2011;Schmidt & Sommerville, 2011;Sloane, Baillargeon & Premack, 2012). Infants also distinguish the victims of harm from perpetrators (Kanakogi, Okumura, Inoue, Kitazaki & Itakura, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%