2016
DOI: 10.4018/ijswis.2016070101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selectivity-Based Keyword Extraction Method

Abstract: In this work the authors propose a novel Selectivity-Based Keyword Extraction (SBKE) method, which extracts keywords from the source text represented as a network. The node selectivity value is calculated from a weighted network as the average weight distributed on the links of a single node and is used in the procedure of keyword candidate ranking and extraction. The authors show that selectivity-based keyword extraction slightly outperforms an extraction based on the standard centrality measures: in/out-degr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nadalje, značajke, odnosno, vektori značajki koji se koriste u postupcima učenja šume slučajnih stabala (Breiman, 2001) temelje se na mjerama kompleksnih mreža (Newman, 2018). Kompleksne mreže primjenjuju se na raznim područjima, poput predviđanja novih veza u društvenim mrežama (Martinčić-Ipšić et al, 2017), određivanja ključnih riječi u tekstu (Beliga et al, 2015;Beliga et al, 2016), modeliranja jezika , analize koautorstva (Meštrović i Grubiša, 2015) i sličnog, dok je šahovska igra samo mjestimično modelirana kroz formalizme kompleksnih mreža, i to u radu (Farren et al, 2013), stoga je to upravo i predmet istraživanja. U radu se istražuju mogućnosti modeliranja šahovske igre kroz formalizam kompleksnih mreža, s ciljem dobivanja boljeg uvida u razvoj šahovske partije, te uvida u način na koji informacije dobivene iz strukture kompleksnih mreža utječu na predviđanje konačnog ishoda partije.…”
Section: Uvodunclassified
“…Nadalje, značajke, odnosno, vektori značajki koji se koriste u postupcima učenja šume slučajnih stabala (Breiman, 2001) temelje se na mjerama kompleksnih mreža (Newman, 2018). Kompleksne mreže primjenjuju se na raznim područjima, poput predviđanja novih veza u društvenim mrežama (Martinčić-Ipšić et al, 2017), određivanja ključnih riječi u tekstu (Beliga et al, 2015;Beliga et al, 2016), modeliranja jezika , analize koautorstva (Meštrović i Grubiša, 2015) i sličnog, dok je šahovska igra samo mjestimično modelirana kroz formalizme kompleksnih mreža, i to u radu (Farren et al, 2013), stoga je to upravo i predmet istraživanja. U radu se istražuju mogućnosti modeliranja šahovske igre kroz formalizam kompleksnih mreža, s ciljem dobivanja boljeg uvida u razvoj šahovske partije, te uvida u način na koji informacije dobivene iz strukture kompleksnih mreža utječu na predviđanje konačnog ishoda partije.…”
Section: Uvodunclassified
“…Detailed surveys of the state-of-the-art keyword extraction techniques can be found in [7], [8], [9]. A comparative analysis of automatic keyword extraction algorithms along with text summarization challenges was presented in [10].…”
Section: A Automatic Keyword Extraction Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing techniques can be classified by approach as supervised and unsupervised, the latter including simple statistic, linguistics, graph-based and hybrid. Supervised techniques require annotated training data, while unsupervised operate without preliminary annotation or labelling (e.g., [7]). A comprehensive study of performance for supervised ensemble methods and base learning algorithms (Naive Bayes, support vector machines, etc.)…”
Section: A Automatic Keyword Extraction Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selectivity is defined as the average weight distributed on the links incident to the single node, and has proven efficient for different language network tasks, ranging from the differentiation between original and shuffled text [49] to the differentiation of text genres [50] and for keyword extraction [51, 52]. We also note that link prediction on Twitter has been studied before in [53], where CN, AA, JC and RA measures were combined with the information about corresponding communities as determined with a variant of the label propagation algorithm in unweighted and directed networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%