2014
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m114.553818
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selectively Targeting the DNA-binding Domain of the Androgen Receptor as a Prospective Therapy for Prostate Cancer

Abstract: Background:The androgen receptor (AR) is a transcription factor regulating progression of prostate cancer. Results: Developed compounds inhibit AR transcriptional activity in vitro and in vivo by selective targeting of the AR-DNAbinding domain (DBD). Conclusion: By targeting the DBD, the compounds differ from conventional anti-androgens. Significance: Anti-androgens with a novel mechanism of action have the potential to treat recurrent prostate cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
85
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, more effective AR inhibitors may also be associated with increased toxicity (especially if they potentially penetrate the blood-brain barrier). Novel compounds (e.g., EPI-001) that bind to the N-terminal domain of the AR and interfere with protein-protein interaction may be promising new approaches [25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, more effective AR inhibitors may also be associated with increased toxicity (especially if they potentially penetrate the blood-brain barrier). Novel compounds (e.g., EPI-001) that bind to the N-terminal domain of the AR and interfere with protein-protein interaction may be promising new approaches [25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutations in the AR-LBD or -DBD in hAR WT of were generated using a QuikChange kit (Agilent). PIPE cloning (19) was used to replace the AR-DBD with the rat glucocorticoid receptor (GR) DBD, yielding ARw/GRDBD as outlined in Table S1. A plasmid encoding the GST-tagged rat C552A AR-DBD mutant was previously described (13).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, we analyzed the crystal structure of the AR-DBD:DNA complex to identify a surface exposed pocket near the protein-DNA interface that could be targeted with small molecules (18,19). The lead compound, VPC-14449, potently inhibited full-length AR in LNCaP cells, down-regulated PSA expression and suppressed growth of xenografts in mouse models (19). However, the mechanism of action of VPC-14449 has not been fully defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar approaches in which the Oct1 binding site of a representative AR target gene was targeted also prevented Oct1-dependent transcription as well as the growth of CaP xenografts (Obinata et al 2016). Alternatively, a small molecule that selectively binds a surface exposed pocket on AR-DBD effectively blocked transcriptional activity of full length AR and constitutively active AR splice variants (Dalal et al 2014). Targeting what were previously viewed as undruggable interactions within transcriptional complexes provides proof-of-principle for development of novel compounds that inhibit critical protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions that are most relevant to AR-mediated lethal CaP progression.…”
Section: Different Molecular Modes Of Ar Action: Opportunities For Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other targets in the pathways leading to aberrant AR activation such as interference with the chaperone proteins clusterin or Sigma-1 (Thomas, et al 2017; Yamamoto, et al 2015), or with the signaling cascade by which cytokines or growth factors activate AR activity (Culig 2004), to name but a few, have been explored also for therapeutic intervention. Parallel efforts have focused on targeting for therapy AR moieties other than its ligand-binding domain, such as its constitutively active N-terminal transactivation domain (Andersen, et al 2010; Myung, et al 2013) or its DNA binding-domain (Dalal, et al 2014). The latter approaches have either not been tested yet in clinical trials or the results of such trials are not yet available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%