Abstract:Since their introduction, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have become one of the most widely used classes of medication in psychiatry. Their popularity is based on apparent efficacy over a wide range of disorders and a favorable side-effect profile. However, as with any psychotropic medication, considerable data are required to define where a drug works and where it does not. There is now a wealth of evidence demonstrating that SSRIs may differ in their efficacy profiles in certain depressi… Show more
“…Both beneficial (Levkovitz et al, 2002;Harmer et al, 2004;Zobel et al, 2004) and detrimental (Masand and Gupta, 1999;Schmitt et al, 2001;Joss et al, 2003) effects have been reported. In part, this may be due to the differing pharmacological, and hence specific cognitive effects, or individual SSRIs Goodnick and Goldstein, 1998). It was not possible to pursue this in the current study because of the small numbers involved.…”
The findings lend support to the SSRIs comparative safety, even among workers, particularly as the symptoms of the underlying psychopathology are successfully addressed. Possible memory impairments may, however, be found in those taking SSRIs.
“…Both beneficial (Levkovitz et al, 2002;Harmer et al, 2004;Zobel et al, 2004) and detrimental (Masand and Gupta, 1999;Schmitt et al, 2001;Joss et al, 2003) effects have been reported. In part, this may be due to the differing pharmacological, and hence specific cognitive effects, or individual SSRIs Goodnick and Goldstein, 1998). It was not possible to pursue this in the current study because of the small numbers involved.…”
The findings lend support to the SSRIs comparative safety, even among workers, particularly as the symptoms of the underlying psychopathology are successfully addressed. Possible memory impairments may, however, be found in those taking SSRIs.
“…Our findings might have some relevance to approaches relying upon the modification of serotonergic functions in the brain for treating disorders such as e.g., depression, anxiety, or post-traumatic stress. Concerning depression, for instance, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) have the best safety record among the different therapeutic options (van Laar et al, 2002), but there is a literature reporting on possible SSRI-related memory problems (Goodnick and Goldstein, 1998;Joss et al, 2003;Wadsworth et al, 2005). Although these memory problems could be related to various confounding factors (subject's history, age, existence of age-related cognitive dysfunctions.…”
Using Long-Evans rats tested in a water maze, this study assessed the role of 5-HT1A/5-HT7 receptors of the medial septum in encoding, consolidation, and retrieval of spatial information. The testing protocol (acquisition: daily four-trial sessions over three consecutive days; retention: probe trial on day 4) was first validated by showing that intraseptal infusions of lidocaine (LIDO; 40 microg/0.5 microL) disrupted acquisition and retrieval of the task. 8-OH-DPAT (4 microg/0.5 microL) infused before each acquisition session prevented learning/retention of the platform location, an effect attenuated by pretreatment with the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100635. With the 5-HT7 antagonist SB 269970, the 8-OH-DPAT-induced acquisition deficit seemed attenuated, but there was no subsequent retention. When infused immediately, 1, 4, or 6 h after each acquisition session, 8-OH-DPAT did not hinder consolidation. When the infusions were performed 2 h postacquisition, however, consolidation was disrupted. Finally, when infused before a probe trial after drug-free acquisition, 8-OH-DPAT had no effect, suggesting no interference with retrieval processes. We also established that 8-OH-DPAT had no effects when the platform was visible, and altered neither home-cage activity nor anxiety-related behavior (elevated plus-maze). Altogether, these results show that 5-HT1A receptors in the septal region contribute both to declarative-like information encoding and subsequently, within a given postacquisition time window, to its consolidation. They do not participate in the retrieval of recently learned declarative-like information. These observations suggest that 5-HT1A receptors of the medial septum contribute to a serotonin-mediated mechanism involved in the encoding and consolidation, not the retrieval of spatial hippocampal-dependent knowledge. These results might have some relevance to approaches aimed at modifying serotonergic functions in the brain for the treatment of disorders such as depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, and amnesia.
“…However, most studies have concluded that SSRIs have fewer adverse effects (Nutt, 2003;Hindmarch, 1995), both in the short-and long-term (Cassano and Fava, 2004), are relatively free from cognitive and psychomotor effects (Hindmarch 1995) and do not impair driving performance (Hale, 1994). The side-effect profiles of individual SSRIs do, of course, vary Goodnick and Goldstein, 1998), as do their specific effects on cognitive function (Oxman et al, 1996). In this study fluoxetine and paroxetine were most commonly used, but individual analyses were not possible because of small numbers.…”
The well established associations between accidents and injuries and older psychotropic medications were replicated. SSRIs, however, were relatively safer. The study also highlighted the need to consider any effect of psychotropic medication within the context of both mental health status and other factors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.