2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.12.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective role of lingual/parahippocampal gyrus and retrosplenial complex in spatial memory across viewpoint changes relative to the environmental reference frame

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
98
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
4
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role RSC plays in these more complex processes could merely reflect the fact that they are usually centered upon permanent environmental features. RSC has also been suggested to assist in translating between and integrating egocentric and allocentric spatial information (Sherrill et al, 2013; Sulpizio, Committeri, Lambrey, Berthoz, & Galati, 2013; Vann et al, 2009; Byrne, Becker, & Burgess, 2007), but again this could similarly reflect the reliance of these processes on manipulating mainly permanent cues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role RSC plays in these more complex processes could merely reflect the fact that they are usually centered upon permanent environmental features. RSC has also been suggested to assist in translating between and integrating egocentric and allocentric spatial information (Sherrill et al, 2013; Sulpizio, Committeri, Lambrey, Berthoz, & Galati, 2013; Vann et al, 2009; Byrne, Becker, & Burgess, 2007), but again this could similarly reflect the reliance of these processes on manipulating mainly permanent cues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptation effects to place, view, and heading were found in a unexpectedly large set of regions, in particular in the fronto-parietal cortex (pIPS, SMG, FEF, IFG: Figure 2C); many of these regions also showed an adaptation effect proportional to spatial distances (Figures 4A,B, left column). It is particularly surprising to find such effects in parieto-frontal regions, which are known to be crucial for egocentric spatial representations (Committeri et al, 2004; Sulpizio et al, 2013; see also Galati et al, 2010 for a review). One possible interpretation, which we develop below, is that adaptation effects in parieto-frontal cortex reflect a process of egocentric updating of spatial locations rather than a true allocentric encoding of places and views.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each imaging run, participants passively viewed eight alternating blocks (16 s) of photographs of faces and places/scenes presented for 300 ms every 500 ms, interleaved with fixation periods of 15 s on average (see Sulpizio et al, 2013). During each run we acquired 234 functional MR volumes, for a total of 7 min each.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The superior frontal and lingual gyrus have been reported [24] [29]- [32] as important structures associated with self-intended actions. The precuneus is a structure considered as a hub connecting the parietal and prefrontal regions [33] [34], and thereby plays an important role in various functions, including retrospective, episodic and autobiographic memories [7] and self reasoning [7] [10] [27]. Many of the sources discriminating NA from YA are located in the superior frontal, fusiform and lingual regions as well as in the precuneus, supporting the hypothesis that self-related circuits are important in establishing NA truth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%