2010
DOI: 10.1017/s1355617710000706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective review of cognitive aging

Abstract: Research concerned with relations between adult age and cognitive functioning is briefly reviewed. The coverage is necessarily selective, and is organized in terms of five major questions. These are what abilities are related to age, how many distinct influences are contributing to the relations between age and cognitive functioning, do the differences between people increase with advancing age, what is responsible for the discrepancies between cross-sectional and longitudinal age comparisons of cognitive func… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

39
608
6
15

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 895 publications
(707 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
39
608
6
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the relation of age and magnitude of practice effect has not been unequivocally established, age has been reported to affect the magnitude of practice effects negatively (Salthouse 2010). Thus, the discrepancy between our findings and the existing body of literature could be explained if performance in the meditation group-consisting of older adults-was actually a combination of small practice effects plus positive effects of the intervention.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Although the relation of age and magnitude of practice effect has not been unequivocally established, age has been reported to affect the magnitude of practice effects negatively (Salthouse 2010). Thus, the discrepancy between our findings and the existing body of literature could be explained if performance in the meditation group-consisting of older adults-was actually a combination of small practice effects plus positive effects of the intervention.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…As Table 5 shows, the main effect of age was significant, with older participants displaying overall much longer RTs (3241 vs. 2656 ms). This was expected based on prior results (e.g., [16,55,56]). Furthermore, the sentence effect was significant, with longer RTs for negative than positive sentences (3038 vs. 2858 ms).…”
Section: Do the Post-sentence Responses Reveal Negativity And Positivsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The time it takes to process information increases with age, and this can affect an individual's ability to remember instructions or attend to important information (Institute of Medicine, 2015). Similar decrements occur in reasoning, visuospatial skills, and working memory (Salthouse, 2010), which make decision-making, way finding, and remembering instructions more challenging.…”
Section: Social Connection and Cognitive Functionmentioning
confidence: 88%