2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.02.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective reductive leaching of cobalt and lithium from industrially crushed waste Li-ion batteries in sulfuric acid system

Abstract: Recycling of valuable metals from secondary resources such as waste Li-ion batteries (LIBs) has recently attracted significant attention due to the depletion of high-grade natural resources and increasing interest in the circular economy of metals. In this article, the sulfuric acid leaching of industrially produced waste LIBs scraps with 23.6% cobalt (Co), 3.6% lithium (Li) and 6.2% copper (Cu) was investigated. The industrially produced LIBs scraps were shown to provide higher Li and Co leaching extractions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
50
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[4][5][6][7] Moreover, there are currently almost no major recycling technologies available for the recovery of Mn from industrial LIB waste as it is usually composed of both active materials (e.g., NMC) as well as impurities like Al, Fe and Cu. 8 As a result, battery wastes with these types of compositions are distinctly different from other Mn-bearing resources like Mn oxide minerals, 9 alkaline Zn-Mn battery waste 10 and deepsea cores 11 when used as a secondary raw material. Consequently, the current technologies used to recover Mn from primary resources are unsuitable for the recovery of Mn from LIB waste, which, in addition to the relatively low price of Mn (e.g., US$1800-1950 per metric ton for electrolytically produced MnO 2 12 ), further reduces the incentives for improved Mn recovery methodologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] Moreover, there are currently almost no major recycling technologies available for the recovery of Mn from industrial LIB waste as it is usually composed of both active materials (e.g., NMC) as well as impurities like Al, Fe and Cu. 8 As a result, battery wastes with these types of compositions are distinctly different from other Mn-bearing resources like Mn oxide minerals, 9 alkaline Zn-Mn battery waste 10 and deepsea cores 11 when used as a secondary raw material. Consequently, the current technologies used to recover Mn from primary resources are unsuitable for the recovery of Mn from LIB waste, which, in addition to the relatively low price of Mn (e.g., US$1800-1950 per metric ton for electrolytically produced MnO 2 12 ), further reduces the incentives for improved Mn recovery methodologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one heavy metal element, cobalt has higher ecosystem toxicity and pollution capacity than other elements in the four cathode materials. This is why many efforts to recover A are concentrated not only on lithium but also on cobalt [41]. There are two examples of Co substitutes.…”
Section: The Element Contribution In Endpoint Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the worldwide spent LIB recycling technologies can be classified into hydrometallurgy, pyrometallurgy, or their combination. 9,12 In the hydrometallurgical processes, the spent LIBs first need to be pretreated to enrich the target metals, e.g., by discharging, dismantling, crushing, etc., [13][14][15] and then dissolved into inorganic acids or organic acids. [16][17][18][19][20][21] The resultant Co, Li-rich acidic leaching solution is then subjected to the subsequent purification and recovery process, for instance, chemical precipitation, 22 solvent extraction, 23 or ion-exchange 24 methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%