2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0926-860x(02)00382-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective oxidation of carbon monoxide in excess hydrogen over Pt-, Ru- and Pd-supported catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
75
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
75
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The conversion continued to decrease with time and reached 44% at 120 min as seen in figure 2. The negative effect of water on conversion was also observed by Snytnikov et al [19] over Pt/C and by Park et al [20] over Cu-Ce/ [15], which provides additional evidence indicating that support-metal interaction plays a crucial role and leads to different results even for relatively inert supports such as MgO and Al 2 O 3 . A similar trend was also observed in O 2 conversion over Pt-Co-Ce/MgO while there was no considerable difference in the selectivity for CO oxidation.…”
Section: Effect Of Carbon Dioxide and Water In The Feedsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The conversion continued to decrease with time and reached 44% at 120 min as seen in figure 2. The negative effect of water on conversion was also observed by Snytnikov et al [19] over Pt/C and by Park et al [20] over Cu-Ce/ [15], which provides additional evidence indicating that support-metal interaction plays a crucial role and leads to different results even for relatively inert supports such as MgO and Al 2 O 3 . A similar trend was also observed in O 2 conversion over Pt-Co-Ce/MgO while there was no considerable difference in the selectivity for CO oxidation.…”
Section: Effect Of Carbon Dioxide and Water In The Feedsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The negative effect of CO 2 and H 2 O seems to be cumulative. The decrease in both activity and selectivity of the PrOx catalysts, due to the competitive adsorption of CO, CO 2 and H 2 O on the catalyst surface has been broadly reported [33][34][35][36]. Again a decrease on the O 2 activation rate due to the competition of oxygen with water and carbon dioxide should be considered.…”
Section: Influence Of Co 2 and H 2 Omentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Analogously in the presence of CO-co-feeding during anisole HDO at 150 • C over Mo 2 C under atmospheric pressure benzene formation was suppressed and completely recovered after CO-co-feed was stopped [44]. Pt/C is active for water gas shift reaction forming carbon dioxide during HDO [84]. …”
Section: Deactivation Due To Strong Adsorption On the Catalyst Surfacementioning
confidence: 96%