2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Nodal Irradiation for Head and Neck Cancer Using Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy: Application of RTOG Consensus Guidelines in Routine Clinical Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11,13,28 Estimates of the detrimental effect of treatment interruption during CCRT with IMRT for SCCHN on survival and local control vary between 1% to 5% per day. 11,13,15 The findings from our comparative analysis of cohorts 1 and 2 are consistent with the literature. In this experience, there were only 3 cases of locoregional progression in the group (cohort 2) for which steps were taken to minimize treatment interruption as opposed to 15 cases of locoregional progression in cohort 1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11,13,28 Estimates of the detrimental effect of treatment interruption during CCRT with IMRT for SCCHN on survival and local control vary between 1% to 5% per day. 11,13,15 The findings from our comparative analysis of cohorts 1 and 2 are consistent with the literature. In this experience, there were only 3 cases of locoregional progression in the group (cohort 2) for which steps were taken to minimize treatment interruption as opposed to 15 cases of locoregional progression in cohort 1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…CCRT duration was dichotomized based on the results of McCloskey et al 13 and Rades et al 11 Interruption of radiation therapy dichotomized as ≤56 days or ≥57 days was a significant predictor of locoregional progression in both of these studies. Additionally, Nangia et al 15 reported a similar outcome. Treatment duration for this analysis was therefore dichotomized into clinically relevant categories of ≤56 days or ≥57 days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Most of the failures were truly in-field in the high-dose region, consistent with previously published data (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). In large series (Table 4) the predominant pattern of failure after CRT for HNSCC has been in-field within the GTV, with marginal failures ranging from 0% to 25%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Consensus guidelines for target volume delineation in the node-negative neck (7) as well as node-positive neck and in the postoperative setting (8), have been adopted widely in routine clinical practice (21), but there continues to be widespread variation in the delineation of GTV at the primary site, even with multimodality imaging (28,29). There is poor correlation between the extent of gross disease at the primary y This lymph node was neither clinically palpable nor visible on response-assessment 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography, but it was reported as a small involved node on pathology of salvage surgery.…”
Section: Target Volume Delineationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Nangia et al reported results of 83 head and neck cancers treated by IMRT method [30]. In their series, hypopharyngeal cancer was present in 13 and laryngeal cancer in 35 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%