2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2014.10.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective naked-eye detection of Magnesium (II) ions using a coumarin-derived fluorescent probe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
78
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 324 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the aromatic protons signal at 8.79, 8.44, 8.1, 7.87, 7.65 ppm were shifted upfield to 8.54, 8.06, 7.76, 7.53, 7.38 ppm while the other signals at 8.6, 7.79, 7.68, 7.61 ppm were shifted downfield to 8.63, 8.73, 8.33, 8.23 ppm in presence of Zn 2+ ion, respectively. These spectra exhibited the binding nature of H 10 L withZn 2+ ion in 1:1 stiochiometric ratio[68,69]. Moreover, these overall changes in the chemical shifts of the proton in presence of Zn 2+ ions suggested that the binding of H 10 L to Zn 2+ forms a rigid system by a strong complexation with H 10 L via O-H and N heteroatoms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…On the other hand, the aromatic protons signal at 8.79, 8.44, 8.1, 7.87, 7.65 ppm were shifted upfield to 8.54, 8.06, 7.76, 7.53, 7.38 ppm while the other signals at 8.6, 7.79, 7.68, 7.61 ppm were shifted downfield to 8.63, 8.73, 8.33, 8.23 ppm in presence of Zn 2+ ion, respectively. These spectra exhibited the binding nature of H 10 L withZn 2+ ion in 1:1 stiochiometric ratio[68,69]. Moreover, these overall changes in the chemical shifts of the proton in presence of Zn 2+ ions suggested that the binding of H 10 L to Zn 2+ forms a rigid system by a strong complexation with H 10 L via O-H and N heteroatoms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The band gap energy (Eg = 1240/ ) at the corresponding wavelength was found around 1.755 eV (for PCTS) and 1.774 eV (for PCTS + Cu 2+ ). HOMO (higher occupied molecular orbital) energy level (for PCTS is −5.456 eV, for PCTS + Cu 2+ is −6.293 eV) was estimated with DPV [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. LUMO energy levels were estimated from HOMO and optical band gap energies (for PCTS is −3.701 eV, for PCTS + Cu 2+ is −4.523 eV) (Fig.…”
Section: Electrochemical Measurement Of Pctsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a microextraction step before the electrochemical determination of AA can be helpful. Electrochemical techniques have shown their potential for the quantification of different species .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%