1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(81)80861-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective management of iatrogenic esophageal perforation in the newborn

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neonates with iatrogenic pharyngo-oesophageal perforation should be treated according to the severity and presentation in each individual case. Removal of the nasogastric tube, initiation of broad spectrum antibiotics and provision of parenteral nutrition / gastrostomy feeds for 7-10 days provides adequate treatment in most cases [9,11]. Most babies can be treated conservatively although surgical intervention may be required in severe cases [11,12].There is no difference in the reported rate of survival when treated medically versus surgically [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neonates with iatrogenic pharyngo-oesophageal perforation should be treated according to the severity and presentation in each individual case. Removal of the nasogastric tube, initiation of broad spectrum antibiotics and provision of parenteral nutrition / gastrostomy feeds for 7-10 days provides adequate treatment in most cases [9,11]. Most babies can be treated conservatively although surgical intervention may be required in severe cases [11,12].There is no difference in the reported rate of survival when treated medically versus surgically [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removal of the nasogastric tube, initiation of broad spectrum antibiotics and provision of parenteral nutrition / gastrostomy feeds for 7-10 days provides adequate treatment in most cases [9,11]. Most babies can be treated conservatively although surgical intervention may be required in severe cases [11,12].There is no difference in the reported rate of survival when treated medically versus surgically [9]. Routine surgical intervention does not improve the survival and should be restricted for patients with mediastinitis or mediastinal mass [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complications such as pneumothorax, pleural effusion or pericardial effusion may require appropriate intervention. Severe injuries may need surgical repair [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,13]. In our patient, a nasogastric tube was placed and the patient was nourished through it for 8 days until the retropharyngeal emphysema was no longer demonstrated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The choice of treatment varies ac cording to the cause and specific location of the perforation and the time to recognition 16) . However, controversy exists as to the appropriateness of conservative management (prophylactic antibiotics, parenteral nutrition and chest drainage) versus surgical correction, with the former being more advocated 7,19) . In our case, conservative management was successful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%