1994
DOI: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90333-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective loss of δ opioid analgesia and binding by antisense oligodeoxynucleotides to a δ opioid receptor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
58
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S2). The importance of the 6TM variants in kappa opioid analgesia was confirmed in an antisense paradigm (15,16). Antisense approaches offer the ability to down-regulate expression levels in adults without impacting development and potential compensatory systems.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 94%
“…S2). The importance of the 6TM variants in kappa opioid analgesia was confirmed in an antisense paradigm (15,16). Antisense approaches offer the ability to down-regulate expression levels in adults without impacting development and potential compensatory systems.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The fact that the response is reversible assures one that the effect is not due to nonspecific antisense toxicity and provides a degree of specificity which is lacking in "knockout" or "transgenic" experiments unless complemented by subsequent breeding studies to reacquire the original phenotype. There are now several examples in which antisense ODNs have been successfully used in vivo to interfere with specific protein synthesis and its physiologic function (17)(18)(19)(20)(21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the antinociception produced by intracerebroventricular injection of DPDPE 1 (␦ agonist) was antagonized by ICI-174864 but not by ␤-funaltrexamine and naloxonazine. Moreover, studies have shown that an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide to the cloned ␦-opioid receptor given intrathecally lowers ␦ but not or spinal (20) and central (21) analgesia. These studies confirm, at the molecular level, traditional pharmacological studies implying distinct receptor mechanisms for ␦, , and analgesia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%