2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.01.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective intermolecular zero-quantum coherence in high-resolution NMR under inhomogeneous fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One way to avoid inhomogeneous line-broadening caused by small-scale field variations is to use experimental techniques that exploit the effect of the distant dipolar field (DDF) originating from the sample magnetization (3)(4)(5)(6). The homogeneity enhancement by intermolecular zeroquantum echo detection (HOMOGENIZED) experiment has been shown to produce narrow line shapes even under temporarily unstable magnetic fields (7), linear inhomogeneities across the sample volume (3)(4)(5), and field distortions in living organisms (8,9). Efficient water suppression (WS) and localization of the acquired signal are essential for in vivo applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One way to avoid inhomogeneous line-broadening caused by small-scale field variations is to use experimental techniques that exploit the effect of the distant dipolar field (DDF) originating from the sample magnetization (3)(4)(5)(6). The homogeneity enhancement by intermolecular zeroquantum echo detection (HOMOGENIZED) experiment has been shown to produce narrow line shapes even under temporarily unstable magnetic fields (7), linear inhomogeneities across the sample volume (3)(4)(5), and field distortions in living organisms (8,9). Efficient water suppression (WS) and localization of the acquired signal are essential for in vivo applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficient water suppression (WS) and localization of the acquired signal are essential for in vivo applications. While different combinations of WS modules have been described and compared (5,10), the inherently low sensitivity of these methods has hampered the development of localization techniques in vivo (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to conventional NMR signals, the signals originated from the DDF (or iMQC) contain some unique properties, the utility of which have been explored in a wide variety of applications, including contrast enhancement or novel contrast in MRI [3][4][5] and fMRI [6,7], suppression of inhomogeneous broadening [8,9], and measurements of magnetization structure [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two experiments were performed to investigate how signals vary with different voxel sizes. In the first experiment, in order to investigate the immunity of iDQC signal for field inhomogeneity with different voxel volumes, voxel sizes of 70 Â 70 Â 70, 60 Â 60 Â 60, 50 Â 50 Â 50, and 40 Â 40 Â 40 mm 3 were chosen, with the volumes located at the magnet isocenter. The magnetic field was intentionally deshimmed by adjusting the y shim coil in all phantom experiments to produce a line width of about 60 Hz for the water resonance at voxel size 70 Â 70 Â 70 mm 3 , and the same shimming was maintained for all iDQC experiments with different voxel sizes.…”
Section: Phantom Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first experiment, in order to investigate the immunity of iDQC signal for field inhomogeneity with different voxel volumes, voxel sizes of 70 Â 70 Â 70, 60 Â 60 Â 60, 50 Â 50 Â 50, and 40 Â 40 Â 40 mm 3 were chosen, with the volumes located at the magnet isocenter. The magnetic field was intentionally deshimmed by adjusting the y shim coil in all phantom experiments to produce a line width of about 60 Hz for the water resonance at voxel size 70 Â 70 Â 70 mm 3 , and the same shimming was maintained for all iDQC experiments with different voxel sizes. In the second experiment, voxel sizes of 70 Â 70 Â 70, 60 Â 60 Â 60, 50 Â 50 Â 50, and 40 Â 40 Â 40 mm 3 were chosen with the same line width of water resonance and with volumes at the isocenter in inhomogeneous fields.…”
Section: Phantom Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%