2018
DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv.7406618
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Inhibition of Histone Deacetylase 10: Hydrogen Bonding to the Gatekeeper Residue is Implicated

Abstract: The discovery of isozyme-selective histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors is critical for understanding the biological functions of individual HDACs and for validating HDACs as clinical drug targets. The isozyme HDAC10 contributes to chemotherapy resistance via inhibition of autophagic flux and has recently been described to be a polyamine deacetylase, but no studies directed toward selective HDAC10 inhibitors have been published. Herein, we disclose that the use of two complementary ligand-displacement assays … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since no highly selective HDAC10 probes have been reported yet according to ChemicalProbes.org, our data designates TH65, with at least 30-fold selectivity (limit of our assay) over other HDACs, as novel promising chemical probe for HDAC10. Interestingly, we found the HDAC6 inhibitor Tubastatin A to be the second most selective HDAC10 inhibitor (CATDS = 0.67), contrasting the original and recent reports 34,35 but agreeing with results of in-cell nano-BRET binding assays 36 . Furthermore, the pan-HDAC inhibitor Abexinostat had the highest HDAC10 a nity in the panel of drugs (pK d app HDAC10 = 7.8 vs.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…Since no highly selective HDAC10 probes have been reported yet according to ChemicalProbes.org, our data designates TH65, with at least 30-fold selectivity (limit of our assay) over other HDACs, as novel promising chemical probe for HDAC10. Interestingly, we found the HDAC6 inhibitor Tubastatin A to be the second most selective HDAC10 inhibitor (CATDS = 0.67), contrasting the original and recent reports 34,35 but agreeing with results of in-cell nano-BRET binding assays 36 . Furthermore, the pan-HDAC inhibitor Abexinostat had the highest HDAC10 a nity in the panel of drugs (pK d app HDAC10 = 7.8 vs.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…For this purpose, we chose Quisinostat which was recently determined to bind tightly to hHDAC10 with an EC50 of 10 nM in time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments. 60…”
Section: Homogeneous Assay Formatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…73 Figure S3). 60 We compared the activity based potency with the recently published HDAC10 binding assay as mentioned above. This assay system was already used to show HDAC10 binding for Tubastatin A, Quisinostat and Abexinostat.…”
Section: Screening For Hdac10 Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…73 Figure S3). 60 We compared the activity based potency with the recently published HDAC10 binding assay as mentioned above. This assay system was already used to show HDAC10 binding for Tubastatin A, Quisinostat and Abexinostat.…”
Section: Screening For Hdac10 Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%