2002
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m108459200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective in Vivo Inhibition of Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Activation Using Cell-permeable Peptides

Abstract: The extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), a member of the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), is essential for cellular proliferation and differentiation, and thus there exists great interest to develop specific and selective inhibitors of this enzyme. Whereas small molecule inhibitors PD098095 and U0126 have been used to study MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK), their target selectivity has been questioned recently. The cross-reactivity of ATP-directed inhibitors with other protein kinases prompted us to dev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, expression of active c-Src in KM12C/Src527F cells impaired E-cadherin localization between cells, although occasionally E-cadherin appeared to localize to fragmented structures between two cells ( Figure 6A, b). In contrast, when KM12C/Src527F cells were treated with the MEK inhibitor (UO126), an ERK activation inhibitor peptide II (Kelemen et al, 2002) or the MLCK inhibitor (ML7), E-cadherin localization was restored between most cells ( Figure 6A, c, d, and f). Treatment with the ROCK inhibitor (Y27632) also caused distribution of E-cadherin to cell-cell contacts when the cells were switched to high calcium ( Figure 6A, e).…”
Section: Mek/erk Rock and Mlck Activities Are Involved In Src-mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, expression of active c-Src in KM12C/Src527F cells impaired E-cadherin localization between cells, although occasionally E-cadherin appeared to localize to fragmented structures between two cells ( Figure 6A, b). In contrast, when KM12C/Src527F cells were treated with the MEK inhibitor (UO126), an ERK activation inhibitor peptide II (Kelemen et al, 2002) or the MLCK inhibitor (ML7), E-cadherin localization was restored between most cells ( Figure 6A, c, d, and f). Treatment with the ROCK inhibitor (Y27632) also caused distribution of E-cadherin to cell-cell contacts when the cells were switched to high calcium ( Figure 6A, e).…”
Section: Mek/erk Rock and Mlck Activities Are Involved In Src-mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ste-MEK1-13 was reported to have an IC 50 of 1373-3075 mM for inhibiting ERK both in vitro and in vivo. 21 This specific ERK inhibitor also increased both cytochrome c and AIF release (Figure 6b) and reduced the degree of Bad phosphorylation (Figure 6c) during serum starvation despite B2 overexpression. As shown, Ste-MEK1-13-induced apoptotic morphological changes in 293B2 cells after serum deprivation for 24 h at a concentration as low as 7 mM and showed a dose-dependent response in the range of 7-56 mM.…”
Section: Involvement Of Erk Activation Through Mek1 In B2 Overexpressmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…* , ***Po0.05 and 0.01 when compared to GFP cells; D, DDD Po0.05 and 0.01 when compared to nonstarved corresponding cells (n ¼ 4) interaction with MEK. 21 After serum deprivation for 24 h, control 293GFP cells displayed significant morphologic evidence of apoptosis as shown by annexin V staining (Figure 6a). In contrast, serum-deprived 293B2 cells only became apoptotic after treatment with Ste-MEK1 13 in a range of concentration from 7 to 56 mM.…”
Section: Involvement Of Erk Activation Through Mek1 In B2 Overexpressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wide use of acylation in general for peptide delivery (Adachi et al, 1999b;Boehning et al, 2005) and of myristoylation in particular (Eichholtz et al, 1993;Kelemen et al, 2002;Niv et al, 2004) made it likely that also the present peptides entered into the cytoplasm. To confirm this assumption, 100 mM of fluorescence-labelled derivatives of peptide 18AD and its non-myristoylated equivalent were added to suspensions of 7TD1 cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For myristoylated peptides derived from the catalytic domains of different protein kinases and used at a concentration of 10 mM, the threshold for a proof of efficacy against cancer cell lines was set at 40% growth inhibition (Niv et al, 2004). The inhibition of Erk phosphorylation by membranepenetrating MEK1-derived peptides exhibited IC 50 -values of 10-30 mM (Kelemen et al, 2002). In contrast, inhibition by the somatostatin analogs octreotide or RC-160 of the proliferation of myeloma cell lines (Georgii-Hemming et al, 1999), or a human oral carcinoma cell line (Dasgupta et al, 2000), respectively, occurred in the nM concentration range, and the latter peptide was more potent when myristoylated.…”
Section: Proliferation Inhibition By a Gp130-derived Peptide A Haushementioning
confidence: 99%