1991
DOI: 10.1037/0021-843x.100.2.133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective hypnotic amnesia: Is it a successful attempt to forget or an unsuccessful attempt to remember?

Abstract: Subjects in 2 experiments (ns = 72 and 50) learned a 16-item, 4-category word list and were then administered hypnotic suggestions to be amnesic for all the words in 1 of the categories. Even when selective amnesia was completely successful, subjects in both experiments revealed a high level of recall for words not targeted for amnesia; moreover, these words were recalled in a highly organized, category-by-category fashion. Evidently, attention to relevant retrieval (i.e., organizational) cues does not oblige … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results have since been partially replicated; Davidson and Bowers (1991) reported that a posthypnotic amnesia suggestion directed toward one category in a four-category list was rnore effective with high susceptible than with low susceptible subjects. Thus, as in the Coe et al (1989) experiments, highs, in contrast with lows, were able to selectively exclude from recall a portion of the items they have studied.…”
Section: Retrieval Inhibition In Directed Forgetting and Posthypnoticsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results have since been partially replicated; Davidson and Bowers (1991) reported that a posthypnotic amnesia suggestion directed toward one category in a four-category list was rnore effective with high susceptible than with low susceptible subjects. Thus, as in the Coe et al (1989) experiments, highs, in contrast with lows, were able to selectively exclude from recall a portion of the items they have studied.…”
Section: Retrieval Inhibition In Directed Forgetting and Posthypnoticsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…One possibility is that subjects do not formulate effective retrieval plans for F-items, a possibility supported by results showing that directed forgetting instructions disrupt organization and reduce the recall of both incidentally and intentionally studied items (e.g., Geiselman, Bjork, et al, 1983). Davidson and Bowers (1991) cued their subjects to forget one of the categories afier the entire list had been learned. Because postinput cuing does not yield significant levels of directed forgetting (see Bjork, 1989 for a review), Davidson and Bowers's results also support the conclusion that different processes underlie directed forgetting and posthypnotic amnesia.…”
Section: Retrieval Inhibition In Directed Forgetting and Posthypnoticmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The specificity of hypnotically induced amnesia is nicely illustrated in a study reported by Davidson and Bowers (1991). In this study, a suggestion was given to participants to forget 4 of 16 words that had been learned.…”
Section: The Empirical Basementioning
confidence: 64%
“…Several studies of directed forgetting in nonclinical populations have demonstrated that information can be forgotten at will (e.g., Basden, Basden, & Gargano, 1993; Bjork, 1989; Davidson & Bowers, 1991; Geiselman & Bagheri, 1985; MacLeod, 1989; Paller, 1990; see Johnson, 1994, for a general review). In the basic directed forgetting paradigm, study participants are exposed to a series of words.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%