2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-3057(02)00380-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective hydrogenation of butadiene–styrene copolymers using a Ziegler–Natta type catalyst 2. Thermal properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, blends of PI with hPB and with PS homopolymers were also studied. In all the SBRs synthesized, TMEDA was added as a polar modifier to randomize the styrene–butadiene sequence as shown by Halasa and coworkers. , The butadiene units can be preferentially saturated over the styrene units using a variety of catalysts. ,,, For the SBRs, we employed a Li/Co catalyst which achieved ∼100% butadiene saturation (no detectable unsaturation by 1 H NMR) and ∼0% styrene saturation (no detectable saturation by 1 H NMR) within 5 h at 50 °C. The molecular weight distributions of a representative precursor SBR with 8.4 wt % styrene and its Li-/Co- saturated product, obtained from their elution traces, are shown in Figure ; these traces indicate that saturation proceeds without significant backbone rearrangements (scission or branching), with the reduction in “PS-equivalent” molecular weight resulting from a reduction in the polymer’s hydrodynamic volume in THF following saturation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, blends of PI with hPB and with PS homopolymers were also studied. In all the SBRs synthesized, TMEDA was added as a polar modifier to randomize the styrene–butadiene sequence as shown by Halasa and coworkers. , The butadiene units can be preferentially saturated over the styrene units using a variety of catalysts. ,,, For the SBRs, we employed a Li/Co catalyst which achieved ∼100% butadiene saturation (no detectable unsaturation by 1 H NMR) and ∼0% styrene saturation (no detectable saturation by 1 H NMR) within 5 h at 50 °C. The molecular weight distributions of a representative precursor SBR with 8.4 wt % styrene and its Li-/Co- saturated product, obtained from their elution traces, are shown in Figure ; these traces indicate that saturation proceeds without significant backbone rearrangements (scission or branching), with the reduction in “PS-equivalent” molecular weight resulting from a reduction in the polymer’s hydrodynamic volume in THF following saturation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UWP fiber is a semicrystalline material, and Fig. 7a shows the five diffraction peaks of WP fibers appearing at 14.8°, 17.0°, 19.7°, 22.3°, and 34.2° corresponding to the crystalline regions as cellulosic material [20, 21]. Figure 7b shows the peaks at the same 2θ values as UWP fibers with somewhat the same intensity due to the same fiber content as for the untreated sample (20 phr) and a low solid content of polystyrene emulsion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value was significantly lower than the T g at 100°C for a PS homopolymer of comparable molecular weight. The glass transition for the PS phase in thermoplastic elastomer block copolymer tends to be lower than that of pure homopolymer of the same chemical structure which is due to the entrapment of some centre block rubbery segments, a kinetic effect which is not thermodynamically favoured (Spaans &Williams, 1995;Escobar et al, 2003). This lowering effect is a consequence of premature molecular motions in the PS domain induced by PB segmental mobility.…”
Section: Thermal Properties Of a Sbs Copolymermentioning
confidence: 94%