2002
DOI: 10.3758/cabn.2.4.318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective hippocampal lesions disrupt a novel cue effect but fail to eliminate blocking in rabbit eyeblink conditioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The blocking effect can be eliminated by extending the conditioning of the second phase, which made it longer, as shown in Figure 12 and confirmed experimentally by [ 38 , 41 , 42 ]. Although lesioning the CHCQ model did not affect the output CR, as shown in Figure 13 , this is supported by the experimental findings of [ 43 , 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The blocking effect can be eliminated by extending the conditioning of the second phase, which made it longer, as shown in Figure 12 and confirmed experimentally by [ 38 , 41 , 42 ]. Although lesioning the CHCQ model did not affect the output CR, as shown in Figure 13 , this is supported by the experimental findings of [ 43 , 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In conditioning, animals with hippocampal lesions do not show performance decrements typically found in healthy organisms when conditioned stimuli are presented in novel contexts (M. T. Allen, Padilla, Myers, & Gluck, 2002;Penick & Solomon, 1991).…”
Section: A Common Principle Of Cognition: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One prominent feature of hippocampal neuron activity is a clear sensitivity to stimulus novelty (Knight, 1996; Stern et al, 1996; Dolan and Fletcher, 1997; Vinogradova, 2001; Rutishauser et al, 2006), suggesting that the hippocampus may act as a novelty detector (Parkin, 1997; Kumaran and Maguire, 2007). Supporting this idea, novelty exposure influences synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus (Manahan-Vaughan and Braunewell, 1999; Lemon and Manahan-Vaughan, 2006), and hippocampal-lesioned animals display deficits in novelty detection (Buhusi et al, 1998; Allen et al, 2002; Hunsaker et al, 2008). The novelty-dependent activation of hippocampal neurons is likely to be a critical feature for learning, allowing circuit modifications that optimize stimulus prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%