2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.2005.07302006.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective growth and expansion of human corneal epithelial basal stem cells in a three-dimensional-organ culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contamination of corneal epithelial elements was excluded by no expression of CK-3 by the conjunctival epithelial cells, in line with previous reports (Joseph et al, 2004, Papini et al, 2005. Probably in response to the culture conditions, all samples from different donors revealed that early in culture the most superficial levels sharply detached, including the positive CK-19 and less intensively positive CK13/CK-10 cells and goblet cells which were all released in the medium, while the inner basal and part of the parabasal cell compartment containing p63 and nestin positive cells remained stably anchored to the submucosa.…”
Section: Isolation and Expansion Of Epithelial Basal Stem/precursor Csupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Contamination of corneal epithelial elements was excluded by no expression of CK-3 by the conjunctival epithelial cells, in line with previous reports (Joseph et al, 2004, Papini et al, 2005. Probably in response to the culture conditions, all samples from different donors revealed that early in culture the most superficial levels sharply detached, including the positive CK-19 and less intensively positive CK13/CK-10 cells and goblet cells which were all released in the medium, while the inner basal and part of the parabasal cell compartment containing p63 and nestin positive cells remained stably anchored to the submucosa.…”
Section: Isolation and Expansion Of Epithelial Basal Stem/precursor Csupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It was probably generated from the basal and parabasal keratinocyte precursor cells that remained attached to the fragment at T1. These cells were rapidly adapting to the culture conditions entering into an active proliferative phase (judging by the increasing Ki-67 staining and constantly low apoptotic cells), as reported in general in squamous epithelia maintained in similar cultures (Michelini et al, 2004;Papini et al, 2005). The basal precursor cells of the conjunctival epithelium kept for at least 2 weeks in culture within their natural environment, seem to have a less complex structure with simple patterns that generate a single phenotypic lineage and apparently have more autonomy with less dependence in extraepithelial influences for their pattering and survival.…”
Section: Isolation and Expansion Of Epithelial Basal Stem/precursor Cmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[6][7][8][9][10][11] Circumvention of these limitations is achieved by human keratinocyte immortalization, [12][13][14] and generation of stratified epithelia in interactive 3D cell cocultures as described for skin, 15 oral cavity, 16,17 and cornea. [18][19][20][21][22] Following immortalization, the resulting keratinocyte cell line should express most of the biomarkers, assigning to tissue homeostatic parameters such as differentiation, to reflect an authentic in vitro model system, suitable as an animal experiment substitute. Regarding this issue, we have recently shown that HPV 16 E6/E7-immortalized human corneal keratinocytes (IHCK) exposed to various biomechanical external cues are still capable to express the above-mentioned biomarkers, critical for corneal tissue homeostasis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important to obviate variations of cell/tissue-innate biomarker expression, hampering interpretation of results with respect to their transferability to the in vivo situation. In light of these critical issues, the aforementioned cornea models suffer from nonuniformity, since they comprise immortalized/primary cell combinations [19][20][21] or in the case of uniformity, 18 consist of only primary cells, which can hardly be used for reproducible in vitro testing, due to the previously described growth limitations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%