2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Formation of Porous Pt Nanorods for Highly Electrochemically Efficient Neural Electrode Interfaces

Abstract: Detailed information regarding the alloy deposition/ dealloying and fabrication steps, the energy dispersive X-ray spectral characterization, histology on chronically implanted mice and characterization of explanted electrodes, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and their small signal components, sterilization effects of autoclave, ethylene oxide, and sterrad, on impedance distribution, comparison of surface and depth recorded single units and extracted composite receptive fields in songbird experiments, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One advantage of using CRFs generated from the MNE quadratic model versus receptive fields generated by linear models is that CRFs capture more variation in natural stimuli. As a result, their spectrograms are visually more similar to the spectrograms of bird songs (Figure 7B-F) (Ganji et al, 2019;Vahidi, 2019). Another advantage of CRFs over LRFs is that multiple CRFs can be extracted for each cell's response, whereas LRFs are limited to one feature per cell.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…One advantage of using CRFs generated from the MNE quadratic model versus receptive fields generated by linear models is that CRFs capture more variation in natural stimuli. As a result, their spectrograms are visually more similar to the spectrograms of bird songs (Figure 7B-F) (Ganji et al, 2019;Vahidi, 2019). Another advantage of CRFs over LRFs is that multiple CRFs can be extracted for each cell's response, whereas LRFs are limited to one feature per cell.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…[ 114 ] Therefore, an ideal electrode should have low resistance and good biocompatibility, cannot cause the death of surrounding cells or produce harmful byproducts during the charge‐transfer process, and be compatible with soft human tissues to prevent fibrosis. [ 115 ] Recently, various strategies to obtain an ideal wired device have been developed, both in the design of traditional rigid electrodes [ 116 ] and more advanced flexible electrodes. [ 117 ]…”
Section: Advanced Designs Of Implants With Charge‐transfer Monitoring or Regulating Abilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the small geometrical sizes also limit the electrical functions of the microelectrodes, and increased impedance and reduced charge injection properties are associated with the microelectrodes compared to the bulky ones. To address this issue, the geometric surface of the microelectrodes can be miniaturized to form conductive, porous, and biocompatible nanostructures [62]. Strategies to improve the electrochemical surface area whilst maintaining the desired geometric area include the development of rough microelectrodes and microelectrode coatings onto traditional planar microelectrode materials such as gold and platinum.…”
Section: Conducting Polymer-based Compositementioning
confidence: 99%