2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-009-1614-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective effects of benzodiazepines on the acquisition of conditioned taste aversion compared to attenuation of neophobia in C57BL/6 mice

Abstract: Pre-conditioning administration of chlordiazepoxide (CDZ; 6-24 mg x kg(-1), i.p.) and alprazolam (0.3-1 mg x kg(-1), p.o.) resulted in a CTA that did not differ initially from that observed in vehicle-treated controls, but which showed faster extinction. The acquisition of AN was impaired only after the higher doses of CDZ (12-24 mg x kg(-1), i.p.) or alprazolam (1 mg x kg(-1), i.p.). The results show that in this test, altered acquisition of an aversive CTA memory by anxiolytic benzodiazepines is reflected in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SNAP-25 +/+ and SNAP-25 +/− mice were singly housed during the conditioned taste aversion (CTA) test. After mice were adapted to a restricted drinking schedule (20 min h −1 per day for 4 days), they were exposed to a saccharin solution (conditioned stimulus, CS; 0.5%) followed 1 h later by a malaise-inducing injection of LiCl (unconditioned stimulus, US; 0.14 M, 2% body weight, intraperitoneally) according to Callaerts-Vegh et al 31 After 24 h of wash-out (drinking water for 30 min), mice could freely choose to drink either saccharin solution or tap water during three daily choice tests. The mean amount of saccharin intake expressed as the percentage of total fluid consumed ((saccharin/saccharin+water) × 100) was taken as an aversion index.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SNAP-25 +/+ and SNAP-25 +/− mice were singly housed during the conditioned taste aversion (CTA) test. After mice were adapted to a restricted drinking schedule (20 min h −1 per day for 4 days), they were exposed to a saccharin solution (conditioned stimulus, CS; 0.5%) followed 1 h later by a malaise-inducing injection of LiCl (unconditioned stimulus, US; 0.14 M, 2% body weight, intraperitoneally) according to Callaerts-Vegh et al 31 After 24 h of wash-out (drinking water for 30 min), mice could freely choose to drink either saccharin solution or tap water during three daily choice tests. The mean amount of saccharin intake expressed as the percentage of total fluid consumed ((saccharin/saccharin+water) × 100) was taken as an aversion index.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also plausible that BZs have more widespread neuroplasticity effects in other brain regions such as the HC (for chronic BZ withdrawal effects, see Shen et al, 2009), although the persistency and efficacy of single versus chronic dosing are still poorly known. However, it should be kept in mind that BZ agonists are especially efficient in reducing conflict arising from internal or external cues in simple and more complicated experimental animal tests, such as Vogel and Geller-Seifter conflict tests (Nazar et al, 1997;Millan and Brocco, 2003), and conditioned taste aversion and neophobia tests (Yasoshima and Yamamoto, 2005;Wislowska-Stanek et al, 2008;Callaerts-Vegh et al, 2009). Furthermore, the BZ lorazepam can reverse punishment-suppressed operant responding for the opioid remifentanil in rats (Panlilio et al, 2005), indicating its efficacy in reversing the aversion-induced change in behavior (a conflict situation, punishment by mild footshocks).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%