2020
DOI: 10.1111/oik.07434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective disappearance of frail juveniles: consequences for understanding social dominance in adult male elephant seals

Abstract: Individual heterogeneity is variation in trait expression observed among individuals of a population. Individual heterogeneity in the pre-breeder stage of development is of importance given its eventual contribution to the breeding population's overall reproductive performance. Yet most studies do not consider the role of individual heterogeneity in pre-breeders when investigating population processes. We investigated individual heterogeneity in the survival and recruitment probabilities of pre-breeding male s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An individual's position in this hierarchy provides information on its own relative fitness, and on how it may influence population dynamics. Individuals with higher vital rates may experience fewer trade‐offs (Hamel et al, 2009a; Moyes et al, 2011; Oosthuizen et al, 2019), enjoy superior social ranks and competitive success (Hamel et al, 2009b; Hart et al, 2016; Lemaître et al, 2018; Lloyd et al, 2020) and contribute more to population growth than lower condition individuals (Coulson et al, 2006b; van de Pol et al, 2006; Zuidema et al, 2009; Jansen et al, 2012). However, these benefits only last as long as an individual's position in the condition hierarchy is maintained.…”
Section: Defining Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An individual's position in this hierarchy provides information on its own relative fitness, and on how it may influence population dynamics. Individuals with higher vital rates may experience fewer trade‐offs (Hamel et al, 2009a; Moyes et al, 2011; Oosthuizen et al, 2019), enjoy superior social ranks and competitive success (Hamel et al, 2009b; Hart et al, 2016; Lemaître et al, 2018; Lloyd et al, 2020) and contribute more to population growth than lower condition individuals (Coulson et al, 2006b; van de Pol et al, 2006; Zuidema et al, 2009; Jansen et al, 2012). However, these benefits only last as long as an individual's position in the condition hierarchy is maintained.…”
Section: Defining Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the costs of reproduction, a biologist will be interested in the probability of breeding in year t, given breeding ψ B,B ¼ 1 À ψ B,NB À Á or not ψ NB,B À Á in year t À 1, as well as assessing any differences in survival probability between breeders ϕ B ð Þ and non-breeders ϕ NB ð Þ. By simply re-expressing the δ, Γ and P x t ð Þ components in terms of the specific state and observation processes of interest, such models can be used to infer the dynamics of conjunctivitis in house finches (Conn and Cooch, 2009), senescence in deer (Choquet et al, 2011), reproduction in Florida manatees (Kendall et al, 2012), interspecific competition between ungulates (Gamelon et al, 2020) and life-history trade-offs in elephant seals (Lloyd et al, 2020). Similar HMMs can also be used to investigate relationships between life-history traits and demographic parameters that are important in determining the fitness of phenotypes or genotypes (Stoelting et al, 2015).…”
Section: Developmental Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, males have a very low chance of contributing to future generations. A small proportion of high-quality males gain dominant breeding status and maintain high survival and reproductive success, even in future breeding seasons [ 49 ]. The remainder of mature males struggle to survive in this highly competitive breeding system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%