2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective decontamination of the digestive tract reduces bacterial bloodstream infection and mortality in critically ill patients. Systematic review of randomized, controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
99
1
14

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
9
99
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Decrease Variable Variable Variable Probable decrease [78][79][80] Daily assessment of readiness to wean Decrease Decrease Decrease Decrease Possible decrease [82] Daily interruption of sedation…”
Section: Variable No Impact No Impact No Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Decrease Variable Variable Variable Probable decrease [78][79][80] Daily assessment of readiness to wean Decrease Decrease Decrease Decrease Possible decrease [82] Daily interruption of sedation…”
Section: Variable No Impact No Impact No Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Nieuwenhoven and colleagues thoughtfully analyzed this literature approximately 10 years ago and demonstrated an inverse relationship between methodological quality and impact upon VAP rates [78]. Nonetheless, a meta-ana lysis of more than 30 such trials published in 2007 found a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of VAP, bacteremia and mortality [79].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SDD involves the prophylactic application of topical non-absorbable antibiotics to the oropharynx and stomach with a short course of intravenous antibiotics. Despite much interest over many years and a large evidence base (36 randomised controlled studies) suggesting efficacy in reducing rates of HAIs and increasing survival [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] SDD has not been widely adopted into intensive care practice worldwide. SDD continues to be a controversial subject, and seems to receive limited support from clinicians [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The content of each of the domains is described in Table 1. The controversial nature of SDD and the uncertainty about its evidence base [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]15,16] suggests that clinicians both within and between different clinical specialities and professional groups may hold opposing views. This study therefore applied Delphi methodology to systematically assess agreement/disagreement with SDD within ICU healthcare professionals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation