2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.01.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective deacylation of peracylated ribonucleosides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Herein, we report that treatment of peracetyl ribonucleosides with tetra‐ n ‐butylammonium fluoride (TBAF) in tetrahydrofuran (THF) and water (95:5) results in the selective deacetylation of the O 2′‐ and O 3′‐positions while leaving the O 5′‐acetyl group untouched (Scheme ). Unlike previously reported procedures,7a,7b we extended the use of this TBAF‐mediated deprotection to peracetylated deoxyribonucleosides and found that the selectivity of this reaction was preserved. The use of a mild reagent such as TBAF for the selective deprotection is advantageous, as it renders the reaction with general applicability and robustness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Herein, we report that treatment of peracetyl ribonucleosides with tetra‐ n ‐butylammonium fluoride (TBAF) in tetrahydrofuran (THF) and water (95:5) results in the selective deacetylation of the O 2′‐ and O 3′‐positions while leaving the O 5′‐acetyl group untouched (Scheme ). Unlike previously reported procedures,7a,7b we extended the use of this TBAF‐mediated deprotection to peracetylated deoxyribonucleosides and found that the selectivity of this reaction was preserved. The use of a mild reagent such as TBAF for the selective deprotection is advantageous, as it renders the reaction with general applicability and robustness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Although there are efficient methods for the selective deacetylation of the O 5′‐position while preserving the O 2′, O 3′ acyl groups, there are only a few protocols that can achieve the selective deacetylation of the O 2′, O 3′‐positions without affecting the O 5′‐acetate 7. Existing methodologies for the selective deacetylation of the O 2′, O 3′‐positions suffer from poor reproducibility, limited applicability, and low yields 7a,7b. Furthermore, a practical chemical method with a wide substrate scope is not available for the selective deacetylation of the O 3′‐position of peracetylated deoxyribonucleosides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fully protected nucleoside 6 (4.66 g, 6.76 mmol) was dissolved in solution 17 of guanidinium nitrate (4.91 g, 40.2 mmol) and NaOMe (0.24 g, 4.44 mmol) in MeOH:CH 2 Cl 2 (450 mL, 9:1, v/v). The reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 30 min at which point sat.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, multi-step synthesis frequently requires the introduction of protective groups and their subsequent removal. [10][11][12][13] Typical methods for removing the acetate groups in acetylated nucleosides rely on the use of methanolic ammonia, [14][15][16] metal alkoxides, [16][17][18] and hydrolytic enzymes, 19 often in good yields. Although all of the above procedures offer certain benefits, they also suffer from drawbacks such as long reaction times, high costs, the use of unstable or noxious reagents, harmful conditions, and the need for special safety precautions, which represent major disadvantages due to environmental concerns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%