2012
DOI: 10.1038/nature11020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective cortical representation of attended speaker in multi-talker speech perception

Abstract: Humans possess a remarkable ability to attend to a single speaker’s voice in a multi-talker background1–3. How the auditory system manages to extract intelligible speech under such acoustically complex and adverse listening conditions is not known, and, indeed, it is not clear how attended speech is internally represented4,5. Here, using multi-electrode surface recordings from the cortex of subjects engaged in a listening task with two simultaneous speakers, we demonstrate that population responses in non-prim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

58
803
3
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 816 publications
(869 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
58
803
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The functional properties observed for speech and conspecific vocalizations in distorted conditions may reflect computational strategies used in these behaviors, and future studies that combine our unique computational approach and behavior paradigms promise valuable new insight into the general problem of identifying signals in the background of interfering sources (5). Although our focus in this study was to determine how different mechanisms contribute to the formation of the cortical representation under convolutive and additive distortions, a wider range of conditions is necessary to expand the findings and to determine how these mechanisms contribute to signal enhancement in various stationary, nonstationary, and, ultimately, competing vocalizations (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional properties observed for speech and conspecific vocalizations in distorted conditions may reflect computational strategies used in these behaviors, and future studies that combine our unique computational approach and behavior paradigms promise valuable new insight into the general problem of identifying signals in the background of interfering sources (5). Although our focus in this study was to determine how different mechanisms contribute to the formation of the cortical representation under convolutive and additive distortions, a wider range of conditions is necessary to expand the findings and to determine how these mechanisms contribute to signal enhancement in various stationary, nonstationary, and, ultimately, competing vocalizations (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ipsi-and contralateral sensors were used to calculate the second attention index, that is, the alpha lateralization index [ALI α = (α att_ipsi -α att_contra )/(α att_ipsi + α att_contra )]. The ALI was calculated over the time course of the trial using a 250-ms sliding window (54) and revealed a temporally resolved measure of attention effects on alpha power (Fig. 5A).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent electrophysiological studies on normalhearing listeners provided further evidence for object-based processing during speech stream segregation (e.g., Ding and Simon 2012a; Kerlin et al 2010;Mesgarani and Chang 2012), in which attention enhances cortical responses to the attended speech stream and reduces the responses to the ignored speech stream (e.g., Horton et al 2013Horton et al , 2014Kong et al 2014;O'Sullivan et al 2014). Ding and Simon (2012a) varied the attended and background speakers separately over a wide range of intensity and found that the neural representation of the attended speech did not adapt to the intensity of the background speaker, which strongly suggests an object-level intensity gain control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%