Abstract:Balanced development of excitatory and inhibitory synapses is required for normal brain function, and their imbalance may underlie pathogenesis of neuropsychiatric disorders. Compared with many identified trans-synaptic adhesion complexes that organize excitatory synapses, little is known about organizers specific for inhibitory synapses. Here we report Slit and NTRK-like family member 3 (Slitrk3) as a postsynaptic adhesion molecule that selectively regulates inhibitory synapse development via trans-interactio… Show more
“…A recent expression screen for synaptogenic proteins uncovered several LRR proteins that have synaptogenic activities (Linhoff et al, 2009). One synaptogenic protein identified in this study was Slitrk2, which was shown to induce both excitatory and inhibitory presynaptic differentiation (Linhoff et al, 2009;Takahashi et al, 2012). Taken together, these observations indicate that a subset of Slitrks function in promoting synapse formation and maturation.…”
Section: Slit and Trk-like Familysupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Other Slitrks induce both excitatory and inhibitory synapse differentiation. Slitrk3-deficient mice exhibit a specific decrease in inhibitory synapse number and function and an increase in seizure susceptibility (Takahashi et al, 2012). The authors of this latter study demonstrated that all six Slitrks mediate trans-interaction with receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase-δ (PTPδ), an action that is responsible for the inhibitory-specific synaptogenic activities of Slitrks, at least, in artificial synapse formation assays.…”
Section: Slit and Trk-like Familymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Knockout mice have also been used recently to demonstrate the involvement of Slitrk3 and -5 in synapse formation (Shmelkov et al, 2010;Takahashi et al, 2012). In cultured neurons, Slitrk5 localizes to postsynaptic sites.…”
Section: Slit and Trk-like Familymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inhibitory synapse formation (Slitrk3) (Takahashi et al, 2012) TrkC PTPσ (in vitro) Excitatory synapse formation (Takahashi et al, 2011…”
Section: Slit and Trk-like Familymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…presynaptic differentiation in artificial synapse formation assays (Takahashi et al, 2012). Other Slitrks induce both excitatory and inhibitory synapse differentiation.…”
“…A recent expression screen for synaptogenic proteins uncovered several LRR proteins that have synaptogenic activities (Linhoff et al, 2009). One synaptogenic protein identified in this study was Slitrk2, which was shown to induce both excitatory and inhibitory presynaptic differentiation (Linhoff et al, 2009;Takahashi et al, 2012). Taken together, these observations indicate that a subset of Slitrks function in promoting synapse formation and maturation.…”
Section: Slit and Trk-like Familysupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Other Slitrks induce both excitatory and inhibitory synapse differentiation. Slitrk3-deficient mice exhibit a specific decrease in inhibitory synapse number and function and an increase in seizure susceptibility (Takahashi et al, 2012). The authors of this latter study demonstrated that all six Slitrks mediate trans-interaction with receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase-δ (PTPδ), an action that is responsible for the inhibitory-specific synaptogenic activities of Slitrks, at least, in artificial synapse formation assays.…”
Section: Slit and Trk-like Familymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Knockout mice have also been used recently to demonstrate the involvement of Slitrk3 and -5 in synapse formation (Shmelkov et al, 2010;Takahashi et al, 2012). In cultured neurons, Slitrk5 localizes to postsynaptic sites.…”
Section: Slit and Trk-like Familymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inhibitory synapse formation (Slitrk3) (Takahashi et al, 2012) TrkC PTPσ (in vitro) Excitatory synapse formation (Takahashi et al, 2011…”
Section: Slit and Trk-like Familymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…presynaptic differentiation in artificial synapse formation assays (Takahashi et al, 2012). Other Slitrks induce both excitatory and inhibitory synapse differentiation.…”
Background: The Slitrk family of leucine-rich repeat (LRR) transmembrane proteins bears structural similarity to the Slits and the Trk receptor families, which exert well-established roles in directing nervous system development. Slitrks are less well understood, although they are highly expressed in the developing vertebrate nervous system. Moreover, slitrk variants are associated with several sensory and neuropsychiatric disorders, including myopia, deafness, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), schizophrenia, and Tourette syndrome. Loss-of-function studies in mice show that Slitrks modulate neurite outgrowth and inhibitory synapse formation, although the molecular mechanisms of Slitrk function remain poorly characterized. Results: As a prelude to examining the functional roles of Slitrks, we identified eight slitrk orthologs in zebrafish and observed that seven of the eight orthologs were actively transcribed in the nervous system at embryonic, larval, and adult stages. Similar to previous findings in mice and humans, zebrafish slitrks exhibited unique but overlapping spatial and temporal expression patterns in the developing brain, retina, and spinal cord. Conclusions: Zebrafish express Slitrks in the developing central nervous system at times and locations important to neuronal morphogenesis and synaptogenesis. Future studies will use zebrafish as a convenient, cost-effective model organism to characterize the functional roles of Slitrks in nervous system development. Developmental Dynamics 243:339-349, 2014. V C 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ObjectiveThis study investigated the proteomic characteristics of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in patients with varicella zoster virus (VZV) meningitis to understanding the pathogenesis of central nervous system (CNS) infection by reactivated VZV.MethodWe used data‐independent acquisition model to analyze the CSF proteomic differences of 28 patients with VZV meningitis and 11 herpes zoster (HZ) patients. According to the clinical manifestations at discharge, 28 VZV meningitis patients were divided into favorable outcome group and unfavorable outcome (UO) group and their differences in CSF proteome were also analyzed.ResultsCompared with the HZ group, the proteins (CXCL10, ELANE, IL‐1RN, MPO, PRTN3, etc.) related to inflammation and immune cell activation were significantly upregulated in the VZV meningitis group (p < .01). The protein related to the nerve function and energy metabolism (CKMT1B, SLITRK3, Synaptotagmin‐3, KIF5B, etc.) were significantly downregulated (p < .05). The levels of a pro‐inflammatory factor, IL‐18, in CSF were significantly higher in patients in the UO group as compared to patients with favorable prognosis (p < .05).ConclusionInflammatory immune response is an important pathophysiological mechanism of CNS infection by VZV, and the CSF IL‐18 levels might be a potential prognostic indicator of the outcomes of VZV meningitis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.