2017
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201703301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective CO2 Capture and High Proton Conductivity of a Functional Star‐of‐David Catenane Metal–Organic Framework

Abstract: Network structures based on Star-of-David catenanes with multiple superior functionalities have been so far elusive, although numerous topologically interesting networks are synthesized. Here, a metal-organic framework featuring fused Star-of-David catenanes is reported. Two triangular metallacycles with opposite handedness are triply intertwined forming a Star-of-David catenane. Each catenane fuses with its six neighbors to generate a porous twofold intercatenated gyroid framework. The compound possesses exce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proton conductivity increased from 3.47 × 10 –3 S cm –1 at 30 °C to a maximum value of 1.33 × 10 –2 S cm –1 at 70 °C (Table S3). Remarkably, the room-temperature proton conductivity (3.47 × 10 –3 S cm –1 at 30 °C and 100% RH) and the best conductivity (1.33 × 10 –2 S cm –1 at 70 °C and 100% RH) of 1 surpassed most of the previously reported water-assisted proton-conducting MOF materials. To understand further the proton transport mechanism, we evaluated the activation energy by fitting the temperature-variable proton conductance with Arrhenius equation σ T = A exp­( E a / k B T ), where σ, E a , k B , and A represent the proton conductivity, activation energy, Boltzmann constant, and pre-exponential factor, respectively. The E a of 1 was 0.34 (Figure d), indicating that the proton conduction of 1 follows a Grotthuss mechanism (hydrogen bond mediated, generally E a < 0.4 eV) rather than a vehicle mechanism (transfer of H 3 O + molecular, generally E a > 0.5 eV). , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proton conductivity increased from 3.47 × 10 –3 S cm –1 at 30 °C to a maximum value of 1.33 × 10 –2 S cm –1 at 70 °C (Table S3). Remarkably, the room-temperature proton conductivity (3.47 × 10 –3 S cm –1 at 30 °C and 100% RH) and the best conductivity (1.33 × 10 –2 S cm –1 at 70 °C and 100% RH) of 1 surpassed most of the previously reported water-assisted proton-conducting MOF materials. To understand further the proton transport mechanism, we evaluated the activation energy by fitting the temperature-variable proton conductance with Arrhenius equation σ T = A exp­( E a / k B T ), where σ, E a , k B , and A represent the proton conductivity, activation energy, Boltzmann constant, and pre-exponential factor, respectively. The E a of 1 was 0.34 (Figure d), indicating that the proton conduction of 1 follows a Grotthuss mechanism (hydrogen bond mediated, generally E a < 0.4 eV) rather than a vehicle mechanism (transfer of H 3 O + molecular, generally E a > 0.5 eV). , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of solid based adsorption processes has been considered as an alternative as it can offer ease of operation with much less health hazard, and the regeneration of adsorbent is inexpensive and reasonably quick. An array of porous materials has been tried as adsorbents for CO 2 capture including zeolites, metal organic frameworks (MOFs), amine-modified porous organic polymers, mesoporous carbon nitrides, porous carbons, and solid amine-based adsorbents . For industrial scale application, the selection of an adsorbent is strongly influenced not only by its ability to capture a large quantity of CO 2 but also the cost involved in the synthesis of adsorbent, the ease of availability of the raw materials, and the operational costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by such a unique hexagonal structure, the so-called “Star of David” shaped molecules are of special attention in supramolecular chemistry. Although a number of such hexagonal metallo-architectures with organic linkers were reported, no nanosized metal aggregate shaped like a “Star of David” has been reported . Fascinatingly, the center of this molecular hexagon is hollow and the 3D packing of 1 is porous (Figure S9).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%