2000
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.74.19.8831-8842.2000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Cleavage of AAVS1 Substrates by the Adeno-Associated Virus Type 2 Rep68 Protein Is Dependent on Topological and Sequence Constraints

Abstract: The adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV-2) Rep78 and Rep68 proteins are required for replication of the virus as well as its site-specific integration into a unique site, called AAVS1, of human chromosome 19. Rep78 and Rep68 initiate replication by binding to a Rep binding site (RBS) contained in the AAV-2 inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) and then specifically nicking at a nearby site called the terminal resolution site (trs). Similarly, Rep78 and Rep68 are postulated to trigger the integration process by bindi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we were unable to detect an enhancement in the probability of hotspot localization to RBS bearing canonical minimal TRS (CAAC/GTTG) compared to RBS alone. This lack of TRS correlation with RBS is consistent with in vitro experimentation that has found that constraints on this sequence exist but are minimal and difficult to define (22,42,43). Additionally, the spacing between the TRS and RBS as well as secondary structure may contribute to the complexity of determining a TRS influence (19,44).…”
Section: Hotspots and Rep Binding Sites (Rbs)supporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we were unable to detect an enhancement in the probability of hotspot localization to RBS bearing canonical minimal TRS (CAAC/GTTG) compared to RBS alone. This lack of TRS correlation with RBS is consistent with in vitro experimentation that has found that constraints on this sequence exist but are minimal and difficult to define (22,42,43). Additionally, the spacing between the TRS and RBS as well as secondary structure may contribute to the complexity of determining a TRS influence (19,44).…”
Section: Hotspots and Rep Binding Sites (Rbs)supporting
confidence: 54%
“…Since 60 percent of sites bearing six or more RBS possessed hotspots, without an identifiable TRS, the presence of an optimal TRS may not greatly influence the localization of hotspots but may rather enhance hotspot intensity. AAVS1, for example, possesses a perfect TRS that can be cleaved by Rep and may contribute to the extremely high frequency of integration at that locus (17,18,43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple lines of evidence suggest that both binding and nicking of AAVS1 by Rep68/78 are required for preferential integration (32,35,56,57,59,61,64). This has led to the current hypothesis that AAVS1 is the preferred integration locus for AAV-2 because it contains the best Rep68/78 nicking site within the human genome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) (5,6,22,32,51,64). RRS/trs combinations have been identified in the inverted terminal repeat (ITR) origins of DNA replication for all AAV serotypes that have been sequenced (10,22,65), as well as AAVS1 (11,57,59).Multiple lines of evidence suggest that both binding and nicking of AAVS1 by Rep68/78 are required for preferential integration (32,35,56,57,59,61,64). This has led to the current hypothesis that AAVS1 is the preferred integration locus for AAV-2 because it contains the best Rep68/78 nicking site within the human genome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, in AAV vectors, which lack rep sequences, the ITR cassette is often integrated into actively transcribed regions of the genome. 53,54 Since AH-gBGAL and AHr-gBGAL both contain the AAV-ITR, the difference in b-gal activity is presumably not a consequence of transgene integration into different sites in the genome, but could be caused by the combination of different copy numbers of the BGAL gene and integration into different sites of the genome, with the AAVS1 site presumably supporting higher levels of transgene expression. A similar effect could be seen with Ad/AAV vectors, with a b-globin locus control region (LCR)-CMV-GFP cassette, integrated into the AAVS1 site.…”
Section: Integration Of 100 Kb Gene Via Hsv/aav Amplicon Vector a Oehmentioning
confidence: 99%