2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.02.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 over iron titanate catalyst: Catalytic performance and characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
155
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 270 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
13
155
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the FeTiO x catalyst prepared using TiCl 4 as a precursor and a Fe 2 O 3 /TiO 2 catalyst prepared by an impregnation method, the existence of sulfate species in the preparation process could significantly inhibit the crystallization of mixed metal oxide phases, resulting in the formation of highly dispersed small iron titanate crystallites, which is totally different from the Fe 2 O 3 particles normally found in previously reported studies. 52 A similar promotion effect by sulfate species on the dispersion of Fe species was also observed by Ma et al on their Fe 2 (SO 4 ) 3 / TiO 2 catalyst. 50 Thereafter, the microstructure of iron titanate crystallites in FeTiO x catalysts was studied in detail using various characterization methods, including N 2 physisorption, Powder XRD, UV-vis DRS, Raman spectroscopy and XAFS etc., and the surface chemical composition and redox behavior were studied using XPS and H 2 -TPR.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Compared with the FeTiO x catalyst prepared using TiCl 4 as a precursor and a Fe 2 O 3 /TiO 2 catalyst prepared by an impregnation method, the existence of sulfate species in the preparation process could significantly inhibit the crystallization of mixed metal oxide phases, resulting in the formation of highly dispersed small iron titanate crystallites, which is totally different from the Fe 2 O 3 particles normally found in previously reported studies. 52 A similar promotion effect by sulfate species on the dispersion of Fe species was also observed by Ma et al on their Fe 2 (SO 4 ) 3 / TiO 2 catalyst. 50 Thereafter, the microstructure of iron titanate crystallites in FeTiO x catalysts was studied in detail using various characterization methods, including N 2 physisorption, Powder XRD, UV-vis DRS, Raman spectroscopy and XAFS etc., and the surface chemical composition and redox behavior were studied using XPS and H 2 -TPR.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…For each sample, two characteristic peaks attributed to Ti 2p 3/2 at 458.6 eV and Ti 2p 1/2 at 464.4 eV showed up, indicating the presence of Ti 4+ [50]. As the XPS results shown in our previous study [6], the binding energies of Ti 2p 3/2 and Ti 2p 1/2 in FeTiO x were smaller than those in pristine TiO 2 due to the strong interaction between iron and titanium species. This phenomenon was probably caused by the deviation of electronic cloud from Fe 3+ to Ti 4+ , because Ti 4+ shows stronger affinity of electrons comparing with that of Fe 3+ .…”
Section: Xpsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Two characteristic peaks ascribed to Fe 2p 3/2 at 711.4 eV and Fe 2p 1/2 at 724.9 eV appeared for each Fe-containing sample, indicating that the iron species in these samples was in Fe 3+ oxidation state [46]. It was reported in our previous study that the iron species in iron titanate catalyst possessed higher binding energies than that in pristine Fe 2 O 3 due to the strong interaction between iron and titanium species [6], and the substitution of partial Fe by Mn did not change this situation. The iron species with enhanced oxidative ability than that in Fe 2 O 3 was still responsible for the high SCR activity.…”
Section: Xpsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations