1993
DOI: 10.1056/nejm199311043291903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Bladder Preservation by Combination Treatment of Invasive Bladder Cancer

Abstract: Conservative combination treatment may be an acceptable alternative to immediate cystectomy in selected patients with bladder cancer, although a randomized clinical trial that included a group for simultaneous comparison would be required to produce definitive results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Modern selective bladder preservation with trimodality therapy, consisting of maximal transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT), radiation therapy (RT), and chemotherapy, can achieve complete response rates of 60% to 80%, 5-year survival rates of 50% to 60%, and survival rates with an intact bladder of 40% to 45%. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Although no randomized comparisons between cystectomy and trimodality therapy exist, long-term data confirm that overall and disease-specific survival rates for patients in bladder-sparing protocols with salvage cystectomy, if necessary, are comparable to outcomes reported in series using primary cystectomy for patients with clinically staged muscle-invading bladder cancer who are cystectomy candidates. 1,5,8,[12][13][14] Successful bladder preservation only has merit if the preserved bladder functions at a level acceptable to the patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern selective bladder preservation with trimodality therapy, consisting of maximal transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT), radiation therapy (RT), and chemotherapy, can achieve complete response rates of 60% to 80%, 5-year survival rates of 50% to 60%, and survival rates with an intact bladder of 40% to 45%. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Although no randomized comparisons between cystectomy and trimodality therapy exist, long-term data confirm that overall and disease-specific survival rates for patients in bladder-sparing protocols with salvage cystectomy, if necessary, are comparable to outcomes reported in series using primary cystectomy for patients with clinically staged muscle-invading bladder cancer who are cystectomy candidates. 1,5,8,[12][13][14] Successful bladder preservation only has merit if the preserved bladder functions at a level acceptable to the patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] These series report a median complete response (CR) rate of 70% (range, 56 -87%) after transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURB) and radiochemotherapy (RCT). The 5-year overall survival rates are comparable to the rates reported in surgical series using immediate radical cystectomy in patients with the same features.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This highlights the difficult and relatively uninformed choice patients have to make: undergo primary surgery, or have radiotherapy in the hope of preserving bladder function, but still actually run a 30–50% lifetime chance of needing a cystectomy. The same may also be true of newer organ–sparing combination treatments which appear to provide acceptable survival rates which may be equivalent to primary cystectomy [1, 2, 18, 19], though the long–term organ preservation rates and QOL for these have yet to be established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%