Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective band gap manipulation of graphene oxide by its reduction with mild reagents

Abstract: Selective band gap manipulation of graphene oxide by its reduction with mild reagents, Carbon (2015), doi: http://dx. ABSTRACTGraphene oxide (GO) can be used as an electron acceptor for polymeric solar cells but still band gap matching for electron donor and acceptor demands more study. The generation of the exciton in such materials is intimately related to the optical band gap. However, exciton dissociation is related to transport band gap that controls the device performance, particularly the open circuit v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
99
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
99
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Optical band gap of GO calculated by Kubelka-Munk function using Tauc plot was 1.3 eV as shown in Figure 2(b). Bandgap energy of GO depends on oxygen function groups density and high oxygen density will generate larger bandgap [43]. Low bandgap of 1.3 eV suggest that GO should produce high yield of solar fuel.…”
Section: Uv-vis Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical band gap of GO calculated by Kubelka-Munk function using Tauc plot was 1.3 eV as shown in Figure 2(b). Bandgap energy of GO depends on oxygen function groups density and high oxygen density will generate larger bandgap [43]. Low bandgap of 1.3 eV suggest that GO should produce high yield of solar fuel.…”
Section: Uv-vis Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique allows to specify the C]Ca n dC dC, which is 21.3% and 18.73%. Also for the C]O]Ca n d C]OH is 52.03%, CdO is 3.54%, and for COOH 4.4% [2]. Graphene Derivatives: Controlled Properties, Nanocomposites, and Energy Harvesting Applications http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/67474 81…”
Section: Graphene Oxidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due its toxicity, it is also preferable to use harmless reducing agents such as fructose, glucose, and ascorbic acid in basic medium, obtaining values of 2.7-1.1 eV [2,16]. The XPS analysis, plays a key role for the oxygen quantification, is shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Reduced Graphene Oxidementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations