2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00114-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective attention to facial emotion and identity in schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
74
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
15
74
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have demonstrated in the current study that identity-dependent expression aftereffects are not the result of local adaptation to image elements of the faces. The existence of an identity-dependent neural representations of expression is also consistent with a number of previous studies (Baudouin, Martin, Tiberghien, Verlut, & Franck, 2002;Ganel, Goshen-Gottstein, & Ganel, 2004;Schweinberger, Burton, & Kelly, 1999;Schweinberger & Soukup, 1998). For example, a recent study of neural responses in monkeys demonstrated that the responses of cells in the amygdala to facial expression depended upon the identity of the monkey demonstrating that expression (Kuraoka & Nakamura, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We have demonstrated in the current study that identity-dependent expression aftereffects are not the result of local adaptation to image elements of the faces. The existence of an identity-dependent neural representations of expression is also consistent with a number of previous studies (Baudouin, Martin, Tiberghien, Verlut, & Franck, 2002;Ganel, Goshen-Gottstein, & Ganel, 2004;Schweinberger, Burton, & Kelly, 1999;Schweinberger & Soukup, 1998). For example, a recent study of neural responses in monkeys demonstrated that the responses of cells in the amygdala to facial expression depended upon the identity of the monkey demonstrating that expression (Kuraoka & Nakamura, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…RTs for identity judgments were not influenced by variations in expression, but expression recognition was affected by variation in identity. Similar results were obtained by Atkinson, Tipples, Burt, and Young (2005), who investigated the relationship between facial emotion expression and facial gender, and by Baudouin, Martin, Tiberghien, Verlut, and Franck (2002), who evaluated attention to facial identity and expression in both healthy individuals and individuals with schizophrenia. The results pointed to an asymmetric interaction between facial identity and the discrimination of facial expressions, with expression judgments more affected than identity and gender judgments more affected by variations in the other dimension.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…In these studies, participants typically fail to ignore irrelevant variations in the identity or gender of faces when processing facial expression, but not vice versa (e.g., Atkinson, Tipples, Burt, & Young, 2005;Baudouin, Martin, Tiberghien, Verlut, & Franck, 2002; Schwein berger & Soukup, 1998). Schweinberger, Burton, and Kelly (1999) examined whether differences in the relative processing speed of the two face dimensions were responsible for this asymmetric Garner interference effect (see also Atkinson et al, 2005;Ganel & Goshen-Gottstein, 2004).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%