Comparative CognitionExperimental Explorations of Animal Intelligence 2009
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195377804.003.0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Attention, Priming, and Foraging Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
(164 reference statements)
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current context, visual foraging refers to a form of visual search (Treisman and Gelade 1980;Treisman and Sato 1990;Wolfe 2010) in which participants are required to select multiple targets from different categories on each trial. The term 'foraging' links this type of task with studies that explores how birds and animals select between different types of food (Dawkins 1971;Dukas and Ellner 1993;Kamil and Bond 2006;Tinbergen 1960). Here, we used an iPad app developed by Kristjánsson et al (2014) to explore attentional constraints during foraging.…”
Section: Visual Foragingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current context, visual foraging refers to a form of visual search (Treisman and Gelade 1980;Treisman and Sato 1990;Wolfe 2010) in which participants are required to select multiple targets from different categories on each trial. The term 'foraging' links this type of task with studies that explores how birds and animals select between different types of food (Dawkins 1971;Dukas and Ellner 1993;Kamil and Bond 2006;Tinbergen 1960). Here, we used an iPad app developed by Kristjánsson et al (2014) to explore attentional constraints during foraging.…”
Section: Visual Foragingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, when priming came from seeing a mate, the number of spiders that found a cryptic mosquito was significantly fewer than the number of spiders that found a cryptic mosquito in the no-priming control. Similar trade-off, or interference, effects are known from research on birds and mammals (Pietrewicz & Kamil 1979;Bond 1983;Dukas & Kamil 2000;Kamil & Bond 2006), and it is widely accepted that, even for animals with brains much larger than a spider's, deploying selective attention is cognitively demanding (Desimone 1998;Pashler 1998). We might envisage cognitive resources being tied up when an animal is selectively attentive to objects of one type, and we might propose that a reduction in available cognitive resources impairs an animal's ability to detect and identify other salient objects (Dukas & Kamil 2000).…”
Section: Specialized Use Of Search Imagesmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Search images pertain to selective attention, not pictures (Kamil & Bond 2006;. Moreover, as our research on E. culicivora illustrates, search images do not have to be based on vision.…”
Section: Olfactory Search Images and Cross-modality Primingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Selective attention best facilitates foraging or hunting for consistent resources but when resources change, either declining or increasing in availability, broadening of attention becomes advantageous [31]. Changing conditions can alter the relative worth of various resources as well as the corresponding sources of information signaling those resources by re-directing attention and reinforcing memories or recognition of alternatives [25,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%