2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective and distributed attention in human and pigeon category learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our peck-tracking experiments (Castro & Wasserman, 2014, 2016, 2017; Sheridan et al, 2019) indicated that pigeons selectively attend to the relevant features of category exemplars. In apparent contrast, the more recent study (Castro et al, 2020) indicated that pigeons distribute their attention among multiple stimulus features. Reconciling these apparently contradictory conclusions requires considering the predictive values of the stimulus features in the different studies.…”
Section: Computational Modeling Of Postacquisition Performancementioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our peck-tracking experiments (Castro & Wasserman, 2014, 2016, 2017; Sheridan et al, 2019) indicated that pigeons selectively attend to the relevant features of category exemplars. In apparent contrast, the more recent study (Castro et al, 2020) indicated that pigeons distribute their attention among multiple stimulus features. Reconciling these apparently contradictory conclusions requires considering the predictive values of the stimulus features in the different studies.…”
Section: Computational Modeling Of Postacquisition Performancementioning
confidence: 85%
“…To find out, we gave human adults and pigeons a categorization task in which there was a single rule-like deterministic feature that perfectly predicted category membership accompanied by six other features that only probabilistically predicted category membership (Castro et al, 2020). Thus, the task could be learned on the basis of either one deterministic feature (which would encourage selective, focused attention) or multiple probabilistic features (which would encourage distributed attention).…”
Section: Computational Modeling Of Postacquisition Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These category specific stimulus features might be discernable from neuronal population responses in visual associative areas in the pigeon brain (Azizi et al, 2019; Koenen et al, 2016). In addition, Castro et al (2020) found in their experiments that with increasing choice accuracy, pecks directed onto relevant features of the categories increased. Thus, during learning the amount of attention to reward predicting cues increased and was clearly signaled by the pecking behavior of the animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, during learning the amount of attention to reward predicting cues increased and was clearly signaled by the pecking behavior of the animals. Based on reward contingencies associated with the resulting responses, the feature that was the best predictor of reward becomes the feature that predominantly, but not exclusively controlled the pigeon’s behavior (Castro et al, 2020). This kind of feature selection does not seem to be based on feature configuration but rather on the additive integration of individual features or common elements (Jitsumori & Yoshihara, 1997; Soto & Wasserman, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, during learning the amount of attention to reward predicting cues increased and was clearly signaled by the pecking behavior of the animals. Based on reward contingencies associated with the resulting responses, the feature that was the best predictor of reward becomes the feature that predominantly, but not exclusively controlled the pigeon's behavior (Castro et al 2020). This kind of feature selection does not seem to be based on feature configuration but rather on the additive integration of individual features or common elements (Jitsumori and Yoshihara 1997;Soto and Wasserman 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%