1973
DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90006-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

11
268
2
3

Year Published

1973
1973
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 444 publications
(284 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
11
268
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These effects were similar to those observed with speech stimuli (Eimas & Corbit, 1973) both in direction and degree of shift. Moreover, as in the case of speech stimuli, adaptation shifts for the sawtooth stimuli were greatest when the adapting stimulus shared all dimensions with the test continuum.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…These effects were similar to those observed with speech stimuli (Eimas & Corbit, 1973) both in direction and degree of shift. Moreover, as in the case of speech stimuli, adaptation shifts for the sawtooth stimuli were greatest when the adapting stimulus shared all dimensions with the test continuum.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…Cole and Scott (l972b). and Eimas (1972) reported direct evidence for phoneme feature detectors. These studies demonstrated that repeated presentation of a consonant phoneme (paired with .a) caused individual features to satiate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Acoustic-to-phonetic category mapping proceeds normally during the unaltered feedback session, producing a certain proportion of "she" responses in response to changes in the frequency of the fricative while the context remains relatively constant (though repeated presentation or production of a sound may also alter perception; Eimas and Corbit, 1973;Shiller et al, 2009). Introducing the altered feedback during the production task alters the relationship between a given articulatory trajectory and its acoustic outcome, and adaptation reflects a stabilization of this shifted mapping (Purcell and Munhall, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%