2021
DOI: 10.1177/1179173x211066005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection versus socialization effects of peer norms on adolescent cigarette use

Abstract: Adolescent smokers tend to have friends who also smoke. This association has been attributed to peer socialization and peer selection effects. However, evidence regarding timing and relative magnitude of these effects is mixed. Using a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model, we examined the reciprocal relations between adolescent cigarette use and perceptions of friends’ cigarette use in a sample of 387 adolescents, assessed annually for 4 years. Adolescent cigarette use predicted increases in perceived fri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Friends’ and siblings’ smoking status are correlated with dual use among adolescents and young adults [ 55 58 ]. Our study investigated some factors which could be associated with tobacco use such as parental ban [ 59 , 60 ] and perception of peer smoking rate [ 61 , 62 ], neither of which have been previously studied to differentiate consumption profiles. Moreover, tobacco initiation with hookah has never been studied to investigate difference in tobacco use profile, even though it has been shown that hookah is popular among young people [ 63 , 64 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Friends’ and siblings’ smoking status are correlated with dual use among adolescents and young adults [ 55 58 ]. Our study investigated some factors which could be associated with tobacco use such as parental ban [ 59 , 60 ] and perception of peer smoking rate [ 61 , 62 ], neither of which have been previously studied to differentiate consumption profiles. Moreover, tobacco initiation with hookah has never been studied to investigate difference in tobacco use profile, even though it has been shown that hookah is popular among young people [ 63 , 64 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, adolescents who had a higher percentage of friends who smoked were four times more likely to initiate smoking at a younger age than their peers (Khuder et al, 2008). However, very early initiation of smoking may be driven more by family and personal attraction to smoking than by peer influence (Loan et al, 2021).…”
Section: Current Descriptions Of Adolescents' Motivations For Engagin...mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, adolescents who had a higher percentage of friends who smoked were four times more likely to initiate smoking at a younger age than their peers ( Khuder et al, 2008 ). However, very early initiation of smoking may be driven more by family and personal attraction to smoking than by peer influence ( Loan et al, 2021 ). Cigarette and e-cigarette use are associated with similar factors, however, youth who use both types of products may have more risk factors compared to those who report to be single product users ( Sawdey et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Adolescents’ Motivations For Engaging In Risk Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H2 builds on the strength of the peer selection effect in which early antisocial behavior leads to increased involvement with like-minded peers (Kiesner et al, 2003), reflecting, in part, a negative change in identity (Courey & Pare, 2009). Research indicates that the peer selection effect frequently either precedes, replaces, or supersedes the peer influence effect in early adolescence (Burk et al, 2012; Loan et al, 2021; Schwartz et al, 2019). Thornberry’s (1987) interactional model, in which all four effects (parental bonding, evocation, peer selection, and peer influence) should be significant based on a reciprocal model of variable relationships, it was reasoned, will find only partial support: that is, the parental bonding and peer selection effects should be significant, whereas the evocative and peer influence effects should not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%