1995
DOI: 10.1016/0167-7187(95)00502-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection versus evolutionary adaptation: Learning and post-entry performance

Abstract: This paper examines the maturation process of firms that enter an industry by constructing new plant and investigates the extent to which improvements in the performance of an entry cohort are the result of a selection process that culls out the most inefficient entrants or of a learning process that allows survivors to improve their performance relative to incumbent firms. Both selection and evolutionary learning are found to affect post-entry performance, but selection per se is a more important contributor … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are mirrored in Jovanovic (1982), Olley and Pakes (1996), Bernard and Jensen (2002), and Melitz (2002), all of whom further suggest that the probability of exit increases as productivity declines. Baldwin and Rafiquzzaman (1995), when considering the survival of a cohort of entrants, find that firms which enter industries at a time of high entry rates are less likely to survive. In modelling exit empirically, it will clearly be important to control of age, size, entry rates, and efficiency.…”
Section: Exitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are mirrored in Jovanovic (1982), Olley and Pakes (1996), Bernard and Jensen (2002), and Melitz (2002), all of whom further suggest that the probability of exit increases as productivity declines. Baldwin and Rafiquzzaman (1995), when considering the survival of a cohort of entrants, find that firms which enter industries at a time of high entry rates are less likely to survive. In modelling exit empirically, it will clearly be important to control of age, size, entry rates, and efficiency.…”
Section: Exitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of concentration on success keeps on being positive and statistically significant too only in distributive sector. This is different to many empirical studies; however, from another angle it may implicitly support the views of Baldwin and Rafiquzzaman (1995) pointing out that entrants could not threaten the existing firms immediately due to smallness and Cincera and Galgau (2005) showing that the time for a new firm to be competitive with incumbents should be five to ten years.…”
Section: Conclusion Implication and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The lender evaluates the density of markets and how the start-ups may enter into markets. Increased concentration implies a higher risk of failure (Baldwin and Rafiquzzaman, 1995). The concentration ratio also may be insignificant for start-ups (e.g.…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%